FUNDING OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY TO
Special Education Programs, State Vocational
Rehabilitation
Agencies, Medicaid, Medicare and SSI's Plan for
Achieving Self Support
A Project of Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc.
295 Main Street, Room 495
Buffalo, New York 14203
(v) 716-847-0650; (fax) 716-847-0227
(tdd) 716-847-1322
www.nls.org
Supervising Attorney
Staff Attorney
National Assistive Technology Advocacy Project
National Assistive Technology Advocacy Project
|Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc.
Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc.
jsheldon@nls.org
rhager@nls.org
This publication, Funding of Assistive Technology to Make Work a Reality,
was originally developed in 2001by the authors for the Northeast Work Incentives Support
Center in the Program on Employment and Disability at Cornell University in the School of
Industrial and Labor Relations. The Northeast
Work Incentives Support Center is funded under Contract Number 0600-00-51202 from the
Social Security Administration, Office of Employment Support Programs to Cornell
University and their subcontractors, including Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc. (NLS) of
Buffalo, New York. It is being reprinted or
republished with the permission of these organizations.
These materials have been reviewed for accuracy by the Social Security
Administration and other federal agencies as referenced in individual articles or policy
briefs. The opinions and positions expressed
herein are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of
the Northeast Work Incentives Support Center in the Program on Employment and Disability
at Cornell University's School of Industrial and Labor Relations, the Social Security
Administration or any other federal agencies, and no official endorsement by the Social
Security Administration or any other federal agency, of the opinions and positions
expressed herein should be inferred. Minor
editing was done to ensure that any examples used in this publication are based on 2002
SSI benefit rates.
The current version of this publication is published and distributed through the
National Assistive Technology (AT) Advocacy Project, a special project of NLS. The National AT Advocacy Project is fully funded
under contract number H224B990002 from the National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education, to Neighborhood Legal Services,
Inc. and its subcontractors. The opinions
expressed herein do not necessary reflect the position of the U.S. Department of
Education, and no official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of the opinions
expressed herein should be inferred.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PUBLICATION CREDITS AND DISCLAIMER
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED IN THIS ARTICLE
I. The Purpose of This Article
II. AT Definitions and Other Terminology
III. Case Scenario to be Addressed in the Article
DISCUSSION OF FUNDING SOURCES FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
I. The Public Schools: Special Education Programs and Section 504 Obligations
A. The Special Education System
1. Eligibility for Special Education Services
2. Eligibility for AT Through Special Education Programs
4. Appeals -- What if the Parent Disagrees with the IEP Team?
B. The Public Schools and
Section 504
II. Vocational Rehabilitation
Agencies
A. Eligibility for VR Services
B. Eligibility for AT Through Medicaid
C. Sharon's Eligibility for AT
D. Appealing Medicaid Decisions
B. Eligibility for AT Through
Medicare
C. Appealing Medicare Decisions
V. SSI's Plan for Achieving Self
Support 49
D. Using "Deemed Income" to Fund a Vocational Objective: PASSes for Spouses and Children
E. Appeals - What if a PASS Proposal is Denied?
AT - Assistive Technology
VR - Vocational
Rehabilitation
This is one of a series of articles
originally written for benefits specialists employed by Benefits Planning, Assistance and
Outreach (BPA&O) projects and attorneys and advocates employed by Protection and
Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social Security(PABSS) programs. The authors are James R. Sheldon, Jr. and Ronald M.
Hager, attorneys with Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc. (NLS) of Buffalo, New York. NLS provides services under both a BPA&O
project and PABSS program, both supervised by Mr. Sheldon.
Both authors have extensive experience with funding of assistive technology (AT)
issues. Both have worked for the past five
years with the National AT Advocacy Project at NLS.
The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999, in its
Findings section, recognizes the importance of assistive technology (AT)1 in
helping individuals with disabilities to work:
Coverage
... for [personal assistance services], as well as for prescription drugs, durable
medical equipment, and basic health care are powerful and proven tools for individuals
with significant disabilities to obtain and retain employment.2
Individuals
with disabilities have greater opportunities than ever before, aided by ... innovations in
assistive technology, medical treatment and rehabilitation.3
The availability of AT can make a tremendous difference in the ability of an
individual to work, even when that individual has a severe disability. In the work context, AT serves several functions:
it may make it possible to participate in an education or training program; it may make it
possible to get prepared to leave the home for work or training; it may make it possible
to travel to and from work; and in some cases, the work itself could not be done without
the AT.
This article will describe how AT can assist individuals with severe disabilities
to overcome barriers to gainful employment. It
will also describe several key funding sources available, in all states, to pay for the AT
devices and services that will help individuals prepare for, get to, and succeed in
employment. Specifically, we will discuss the
public school special education system, state vocational rehabilitation agencies,
Medicaid, Medicare, and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program's Plan for
Achieving Self Support.
We are writing this for a primary audience of individuals who work for either a
Benefits Planning, Assistance and Outreach (BPA&O) project or a Protection and
Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social Security (PABSS) program, both of which are mandated
to serve individuals with disabilities who receive either SSI or Social Security
Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. We
assume that this article will also be distributed to many SSI and SSDI beneficiaries,
their families, and the agencies that serve them.
Assistive
technology is a term that gained popularity after it appeared in the Technology Related
Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act in 1988.4 Known
by many as the Tech Act,5 this legislation provides definitions for AT devices and services:
The
term "assistive technology device" means any item, piece of equipment, or
product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that
is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of individuals with
disabilities.
* * * * *
The
term "assistive technology service" means any service that directly assists an
individual with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive
technology device.6
The term AT service specifically
includes evaluations to determine the need for a device, customizing or adapting the
device for its user, repairs, maintenance and training on how to use the device.
The popular use of the term AT is of recent vintage and only a few funding sources
have adopted it to date, including the special education and the vocational rehabilitation
systems.7 For this reason, individuals with disabilities and
the advocates who work with them need to communicate with funding sources, concerning AT,
in the language which has meaning to them. When
dealing with Medicaid or Medicare, the term "durable medical equipment" is used
most frequently to describe traditional items like wheelchairs, augmentative and
alternative communication devices, and hospital beds.
A wide range of other terms, such as prosthetic device or orthopedic appliance,
will often be used to describe what we think of as AT.
When the term AT is used by a program or funding source, it will usually include
the variety of devices and services which will be encompassed by the many other terms.
Many persons with disabilities can benefit greatly from AT, including those with
physical, visual, cognitive and hearing impairments. The
following is a list of AT devices that a person may need to receive training, leave the
home, travel to work, or perform work:
1
Power and custom-made wheelchairs
2
Augmentative and alternative communication devices
3
Environmental control units
4
Lifting devices, such as Hoyer lifts and ceiling track lifts
5
Vehicle modifications, including wheelchair lifts and hand controls
6
Computer equipment and adaptations, including braille printers, voice output, touch
screens, and switches which allow computer access through voluntary movements such as eye
blinks or head movements
7
Assistive listening devices, including hearing aids and personal FM units
8
Home modifications, including ramps, lifts and stair glides
9
Work site modifications, including adapted office equipment and environmental
control devices
10
Classroom modifications, including adaptive seating systems
These devices and others have been
obtained for persons with disabilities through a wide range of funding sources, including
the special education system, the state vocational rehabilitation agency, the state's
Medicaid program, Medicare, the SSI program's Plan for Achieving Self Support, and many
others. Sometimes a device will only be funded
following an administrative hearing or court appeal.
Low-tech AT may cost under $50. Some
devices are much more expensive, however. For
example, a package of computer equipment for a computer programmer who is blind may cost
more than $10,000. Similarly, many power
wheelchairs sought through Medicaid will cost more than $10,000. As the cost escalates, the likelihood that a
funding source will deny approval increases.
To give context for this article, we are providing the reader with a case scenario
in which the individual with the disability needs AT to receive training, leave the home,
travel to work, and perform work. In order to
touch on several funding sources for children and adults, we have made the individual an
older teen who can be expected to have certain needs as a young adult. Although our hypothetical individual is a person
who is expected to go on to college, AT may be equally useful to the individual who will
go straight from a public school program to work or a non-college training program.
Consider Sharon, who is 17 years old and has cerebral palsy, a diagnosis she
has had since birth. She is completing
her junior year in high school, has above average grades, and plans to attend college to
become an attorney. Sharon's 18th
birthday will occur in December of her senior year in high school. Although Sharon attends all regular classes, she
receives support services from a special education teacher in the classroom, as well as
speech pathology, occupational therapy, and physical therapy services from her school's
special education department.
Sharon resides with her mother, stepfather and 12 year old brother who does not
have a disability. Her father died when Sharon
was young and she now collects $420 in Social Security survivor's benefits on her father's
Social Security record. Her parent's combined
annual income is about $60,000, which makes her ineligible for SSI at this point because
both the parent's and stepparent's income is considered available to Sharon.
Sharon has already visited the School of Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell
University in Ithaca, New York and hopes to attend undergraduate school there. Her good grades and SAT scores should ensure her
acceptance at the school. Her home is a
30-mile, round-trip commute from the campus, but public transportation is not available
for this travel. Sharon plans to continue
living at home and commute to the campus.
Sharon and her parents have identified the following AT, which is needed presently
or is an expected need over the next three to five years:
1 A power wheelchair: Sharon's existing lightweight wheelchair is something she can self propel on level terrain for distances up to about 200 feet. If she attends college at Cornell (the university and the village of Ithaca are extremely hilly), she will not be capable of independent mobility without a power wheelchair. Even in flat areas, the buildings on this campus (and most campuses) are spaced far enough apart that she could not propel her manual wheelchair between classes.
2 An augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device: Sharon's speech is understandable only to familiar listeners. She currently has a seven-year old device that allows her to speak by electronic means. This device is constantly in for repairs and it has become more difficult to find the parts to repair it.
3
A laptop computer with adapted keyboard and voice input software: Sharon has extreme difficulty writing and currently has
a note taker in school, funded through the special education program. She uses her family's six year old personal
computer at home, with an adapted keyboard, to do all school assignments. Despite her severe speech problems, a local
university's evaluation recommends the latest in software technology to allow her to
dictate notes, assignments and papers into the computer.
The evaluators tell Sharon that the software program will be able to pick up her
speech patterns and capture what she says with up to 90 percent accuracy. (Sharon's speech pathologist is recommending that
she consider a combination laptop computer/AAC device that can meet both the speech output
and personal computer functions at a fraction of the cost of the two devices combined.)
4 A ceiling track lift: Currently, Sharon's parents use a traditional Hoyer lift to get her into and out of bed, and to meet her needs in the bathroom. Her mother finds it increasingly difficult to operate the lift and her stepfather's business requires frequent out-of-town trips. The more expensive, state-of-the-art ceiling track lift would allow Sharon to more safely and efficiently meet her needs in order to get out of the home to attend college.
5 Access ramp at the home: Currently, Sharon and her wheelchair must go up and down stairs to enter or exit the home. The family uses a makeshift method with two long planks to allow her to move up and down the stairs. She also needs two persons to guide the wheelchair up or down. A ramp will allow Sharon to safely come and go without a second person to help her. The ramp will become particularly important when Sharon starts using the heavier power wheelchair.
6 A van, specifically modified for a wheelchair user: Based on a recent driver evaluation, Sharon was found capable of driving a van equipped with the various modifications that allow her to drive from her wheelchair (hydraulic lift, wheelchair lock down, hand controls, etc.). If she can obtain the van while she is in college, she will avoid the expense of a private wheelchair van service to take her to college. The van will be needed for travel to work after she leaves college.
This article will discuss the following potential funding sources for AT:
1
the public schools, including their special education programs and obligations
under section 504 of the federal Rehabilitation Act
2
state vocational rehabilitation agencies
3
Medicaid
4
Medicare
5
SSI's Plan for Achieving Self Support
For each funding source, we will go
through the key criteria to obtain funding for AT, including:
1
How one becomes eligible for the program or service
2
The criteria that program follows for covering AT devices and services, and the
likelihood that the program would fund the devices sought by Sharon
3
Any appeal procedures for challenging a denial of funding
A. The Special Education System
1.
Eligibility for Special
Education Services
The special education rights of children and parents, as well as the
responsibilities of school districts, are spelled out in a major federal law, the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).8 The
IDEA guarantees, in every state, that all eligible children with disabilities receive a
free appropriate public education, which is designed to meet their unique needs. It must be at no cost to the parents or student. Since there can be no income test for special
education services, it does not matter, for example, that Sharon's parents have an annual
income of $60,000. The income could be half
that amount or double that amount and she would be eligible for the same services.
The IDEA applies to all students aged 3 through 21, or until the student receives a
regular high school diploma. To qualify for
special education services, a child must have a disability, such as a speech, mobility,
orthopedic, health, hearing or visual impairment, mental retardation, or a learning or
emotional disability, because of which the child requires special education and related
services. Special education is defined as
specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of the child. Related services are defined as developmental,
corrective and other support services required to assist a student with a disability to
benefit from an education and include occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech
pathology, counseling, health services, and parent training.
Sharon is eligible for special education and related services (i.e., speech
pathology, occupational therapy and physical therapy), even though she attends all regular
classes. This is because she needs the extra
services to adequately benefit from her education.
The IDEA also requires that students receive their special education assistance in
the least restrictive environment appropriate to meet their needs. This means that removal from regular education
classes occurs only when a student cannot be successfully educated in regular classes,
even with supplemental aids and services.
When a student is removed from the regular educational environment for part of the
day, the student must still be educated with nondisabled peers as much as possible.
The needs of the student and the services to be provided must be designated, in
writing, on an individualized education program (IEP).
The IEP must be developed at a meeting with a group of people, including the
parents and teachers. The IEP must specify all
of the educational services planned for a child, including the child's placement, the
special education services, and any supplementary aids or related services. The IEP will also indicate how often these services
will be provided. The IEP Team must review the
IEP at least once per year and more often if requested by a parent or teacher.
2.
Eligibility for AT Through
Special Education Programs
In 1990, the IDEA was amended and the definitions of AT were added. AT may be
considered as special education, related services or supplementary aids and services to
ensure placement in the least restrictive environment.
The services are to be decided upon by the IEP Team and indicated in the IEP.9
Any request for special education services, including AT, should be made, in
writing, to the IEP Team. This starts the
process to determine what, if any, AT may be necessary to meet the child's educational
needs. Before the IEP Team can determine a
child's need for AT, it is required to obtain an appropriate evaluation. If the parent disagrees with the findings of the
school district's evaluator, the parents can request that the school pay for an
independent evaluation.
The key question is whether the AT is needed to ensure that the student receives a
free appropriate public education. The
decision must always be made based on the individual needs of the student as determined by
the participants at the IEP Team meeting. AT
can be approved if it is needed to assist the child to achieve meaningful educational
progress, remain in the least restrictive setting, or prepare him or her for the
transition to adult life. AT should always be
considered before a decision is made to place a student in a more restrictive setting.
The AAC device is an item that special education programs have
frequently funded. It would meet the
definition of AT device as a supplementary aid or special education service. As her only effective means of communicating with
teachers and peers, it will ensure that Sharon can effectively participate in the regular
classroom. If specialized software is needed,
or if training is needed to learn how to use the AAC device, those items would be AT
devices and services, respectively, and could also be approved by the special education
system. Finally, in order to fully learn to
use the device and benefit from its use, Sharon should be allowed to take it home, despite
any increased chances of damage to this expensive item.10
The laptop computer with specialized keyboard and voice input software
are items that can be funded through a special education system. They will become important to Sharon as she and the
special education system plan her transition from the public school system to
college and eventual employment. The school
may argue that she does not need the laptop to benefit from her education, as she can use
the computers in the school library. Sharon
may counter that the laptop is needed to meet the increased homework demands during her
last two years of high school. Since the
special education program has an obligation to prepare Sharon for the transition to higher
education, her later need for the laptop will be an added argument for providing it while
she is still in high school. Based on the
limited facts we are given, it appears that Sharon will have a strong case for the
computer and accessories, which may depend on how well she is able to both succeed in high
school and prepare for the transition to college without them.
Since both the AAC device and the laptop (or one dual purpose device) will be very
important to Sharon as she enters college, it will be very important that any devices she
receives during high school stay with her as she leaves.
This can be a problem, as most special education programs around the country will
retain ownership of equipment purchased by them and the equipment will remain with the
school when the student graduates. For this
reason, Sharon may wish to investigate funding of these items by another entity, such as
Medicaid or her state's vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency, that will allow her to
retain ownership.11
The special education program will probably not be responsible for purchasing the ceiling
track lift, the access ramp, or the modified vehicle as they are not directly
connected to whether Sharon benefits from her education.
Nor are they needed, as special education or related services, to prepare her for
the transition to adult life. However, a
special education system will be responsible to provide Sharon with accessible
transportation to and from school, including any off site programs that are part of her
curriculum. Based on the facts presented, it
would also not appear that the school is responsible for the power wheelchair,
as it is not needed for Sharon to benefit from her education. Special education programs have been required to
pay for mobility equipment, like wheelchairs, under limited circumstances.12 In Sharon's case, it appears that she can propel
her manual wheelchair to meet her needs in the public school. Her problem will occur when she goes to Cornell
University or another college.
4. Appeals -- What if the Parent Disagrees with the IEP Team?
Any time a parent or guardian disagrees with the services proposed on the IEP, a
hearing can be requested. The parent has the
right to be represented by an attorney or other advocate and can present witnesses and
other evidence in support of the appeal.
The current program is to remain in place while any appeal is pending. For example, if last year's IEP provided for use of
a special computer and this year's IEP eliminated that provision, a hearing request would
guarantee that the computer is provided during the course of the appeal. Additionally, if a student moves from one school
district to another in the State, and the new school district refuses to recommend the
computer and the parents request a hearing, the new school district must provide the
computer until the case is resolved.
B. The Public Schools and Section 504
The rights of children whose disabilities do not meet the criteria for special
education, but who still may need some specialized assistance, including AT, are covered
by section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (section 504).13 Under section 504, schools must take reasonable
steps to ensure that these students have access to the full range of programs and
activities offered by the school.
To determine a student's eligibility and needs, school districts may choose to
simply use the IEP Team procedures and IEP. If
other procedures are used, they must include the following:
1
the student must be provided with a comprehensive, individualized evaluation of his
or her needs, with regular reevaluations;
2
the decision about eligibility and services must be made by a group of people,
including the parents, knowledgeable about the child, the evaluation information, and the
placement options;
3
the student's needs must be specifically identified in writing; and
4
parents have due process rights if they disagree with the district's
recommendations, including the right to an impartial hearing.
Section 504 does not include the right
to an independent evaluation at school district expense.14 However, it does include the right to status
quo, i.e., the continuation of existing services pending an appeal.15
In the event that Sharon did not meet the criteria as a special education student,
section 504 would still be available to ensure that she has full access to the school and
its services. For example, to allow Sharon to
move about the school, section 504 may require the installation of access ramps to allow
her to enter and leave the building. It may
also require the installation of an elevator to allow her to reach various locations in
the school. If the school provides computers
in its library to all students, section 504 would require that adaptations be provided to
allow Sharon to use the computers despite her severe disability.
A. Eligibility for VR Services
State vocational rehabilitation (VR) agencies can play a critical role in assisting
people with disabilities to enter the work force.16 VR
services are to empower individuals to maximize employability, economic
self-sufficiency, independence and integration into the work place and the community
through comprehensive and coordinated state-of-the-art programs.17 The comments to the 2001 regulations reaffirm this
maximization requirement. They
note that States must look beyond options in entry-level employment for VR program
participants who are capable of more challenging work.18
An eligible individual must be disabled and require VR services to prepare
for, secure, retain or regain employment. Persons must show a mental, physical or
learning disability that interferes with the ability to work. It need not be so severe as to qualify the person
for SSDI or SSI benefits. It need only be a
substantial impediment to employment. Recipients
of SSDI or SSI disability benefits are presumed to be eligible for VR services, if they
intend to achieve an employment outcome. Although
VR services may be denied if a person cannot benefit from them, a person is presumed
capable of employment, unless the VR agency shows by clear and convincing evidence they
cannot benefit. Any service an individual is
to receive from the VR system must be connected to an ultimate employment goal.
The written Individualized Plan for Employment (IPE) lists the
employment goal and the specific services to be provided.
This plan is to be developed by the consumer, with assistance from the VR counselor
if requested, and approved by the VR agency. Prior
to developing the IPE there must be a comprehensive assessment, to the extent necessary to
determine the employment outcome, objectives and nature and scope of VR services. It may also include a referral for the provision of
rehabilitation technology services, to assess and develop the capacities of the
individual to perform in a work environment.
The VR agency must ensure that all necessary services are provided to equip the
individual for employment. It cannot choose to
provide only some services to eligible individuals to save costs. The severity of an individual's disability or
the cost of services can have no bearing on the scope of services the individual
receives.19
The services available from the VR system are incredibly broad and varied. The following are representative VR services under
which AT could be funded: (1) an assessment by someone skilled in rehabilitation
technology (i.e., AT); (2) services needed for the diagnosis and treatment of physical or
mental impairments, including prosthetic and orthotic devices, eyeglasses and visual
services; (3) transportation, including the purchase and repair of vehicles, including
vans; (4) interpreter services, readers, rehabilitation teaching, and orientation and
mobility services; (5) AT, including vehicular modification, telecommunications, sensory,
and other technological aids and devices; (6) transition services for students with
disabilities; (7) other goods and services determined necessary to achieve an employment
outcome; and (8) post-employment services necessary to assist an individual to retain,
regain or advance in employment.
States need not consider financial need when providing VR services. However, any
financial needs test must take into account the individual's disability-related expenses. The individual's level of participation must not be
so high as to effectively deny the individual a necessary service. SSI and SSDI recipients are totally exempt from any
financial needs test.
The following services must be provided without regard to financial need: (1)
diagnostic services; (2) counseling, guidance and referral services; (3) job placement;
(4) personal assistance services; and (5) any auxiliary aid or service, such
as interpreter or reader services, that the individual needs to participate in the VR
program and which would be mandated under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act or the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
VR agencies will not pay for a service if a comparable benefit is available through
another provider. For example, if an applicant
qualifies for personal assistance services through Medicaid, the VR agency will not
provide them. But, loans, which must be
repaid, are not similar benefits.20 A Plan for
Achieving Self Support (PASS) is not a comparable benefit.21 Additionally, AT is exempt from the comparable
benefit requirement.
Most of the items listed in the Sharon scenario, above, can potentially be funded
through a state VR agency if she can establish: i) that she needs the item to reach her
vocational goal; and ii) that she meets the VR agency's financial need criteria, if any.22 Generally, she would also need to show that she has
exhausted any comparable benefits that may be available to pay for the item. However, since each of the items sought should meet
the definition of an AT device or service, their funding is exempt from the comparable
benefit requirement.
More than likely, the VR agency will refer Sharon to either Medicaid or Medicare
(if she is eligible for those programs) to fund the power wheelchair and AAC device,
even though those items are exempt from the comparable benefit requirements. Both Medicaid
and Medicare will routinely fund those items when they are medically necessary. Sharon should be encouraged to foster good will
with the VR agency by first seeking Medicaid or Medicare funding for these items.
The laptop computer, with accessories, and the access ramps are items
that are likely to be funded through the VR agency if Sharon can show they are necessary
for the success of her vocational plan. It is
less likely that Medicaid or Medicare will be able to fund these items.23 Sharon need not exhaust SSI's PASS as a potential
funding source as that is not considered a comparable benefit.
The ceiling track lift is a more difficult argument. A VR agency can fund home modifications, under the
category of rehabilitation technology, when necessary to allow a person to leave the house
to attend a training program, set up a home business, or go to work. The ceiling track lift, which is typically used to
get a person to and from the bed or bath, may be viewed more like a personal hygiene aid. Sharon's best approach is to argue that the ceiling
track lift, like the access ramp and the van modifications, is necessary to get her out of
the house and to school.
In a few states, the VR agency will fund a vehicle lease or purchase
if needed to participate in a VR program. It is clear that the federal VR regulations
permit a state to fund vehicles, but less clear whether it would require that they do so
in all cases.24 Under the facts presented, however, one should
argue that since the purchase or lease of a vehicle would be less expensive than a private
transportation service to and from college for four years, a vehicle should be purchased
or leased for Sharon. In all states, the
agency should pay for the modifications to allow Sharon to get into the van and drive it
from her wheelchair.
Anyone dissatisfied with a decision by the VR agency has the right to appeal. Appeals can be pursued through mediation or an
administrative hearing before an impartial hearing officer.
The Client Assistance Program (CAP) is available in every state to assist
individuals who have questions or who are appealing a VR decision.
At a hearing, the individual has the right to be represented by an attorney or
other advocate. The individual can present
evidence and cross examine witnesses. The
hearing decision is final and must be implemented, unless appealed. Either party may appeal a final administrative
decision to court. However, pending review in
court, the final administrative decision must be implemented.
Medicaid, also known as Medical Assistance, is a cooperative federal-state program
authorized by Title XIX of the Social Security Act.25 It
is a health insurance program, designed to serve persons with limited income and
resources. Although every state has the option
of whether or not to have a Medicaid program, every state has exercised that option. Administration of Medicaid will occur at the state
level, with the state Medicaid agency often delegating decision making to other state
agencies, to county or local Medicaid units, or to managed care organizations. Medicaid can pay for a wide range of health-related
costs for both children and adults with disabilities, including many of the items sought
by Sharon.
Medicaid is typically the only or primary health insurance plan for persons with
disabilities who have limited income. Additionally,
an increasing number of individuals with disabilities are looking to Medicaid as their
primary health insurance plan, notwithstanding higher levels of income. Medicaid may be available to those individuals
through state-specific Medicaid waivers, through optional Medicaid buy-in programs, or
through the section 1619(b) provisions.
Medicaid eligibility will vary somewhat from state to state. Generally, the majority of persons with severe
disabilities will become Medicaid-eligible in one of two ways: through the SSI program or
through the medically needy program. In 39
states and the District of Columbia, an individual eligible for SSI is automatically
eligible for Medicaid. If the SSI check is as
little as $1, Medicaid eligibility is guaranteed.26 In
most of these states, an SSI application is also a Medicaid application and no additional
action is needed to ensure Medicaid eligibility. However,
the following states require a separate Medicaid application: Alaska, Idaho, Kansas,
Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and the Northern Mariana Islands.
In 11 states, known as section 209(b) states, Medicaid eligibility is not automatic
for SSI recipients. These states use their own
Medicaid eligibility criteria which differs from SSI eligibility criteria.27 The states which exercise the 209(b) option are:
Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota,
Ohio, Oklahoma, and Virginia.28
Four separate categories of former SSI recipients can retain automatic Medicaid
eligibility as if they were still receiving SSI. These
include:
1
Recipients of Social Security Widow's/Widower's Benefits. If a person loses SSI when he or she becomes
entitled to widow's or widower's benefits under Social Security, the person will remain
automatically eligible for Medicaid if SSI eligibility would continue in the absence of
the widow's or widower's benefits. Eligibility
continues only for so long as the person remains ineligible for Medicare, a period of 24
months following the first month of Social Security eligibility.29
2
Recipients of Social Security Disabled Adult Child's Benefits. Recipients of Social Security Child's Insurance
Benefits, often referred to as Disabled Adult Child's (DAC) benefits, can continue
eligibility for automatic Medicaid if, after July 1, 1987, the person lost SSI due to
entitlement to or an increase in DAC benefits.30
3
The Pickle Amendment. This
protects certain persons who lost SSI because of cost of living increases in Social
Security benefits since April 1977. Automatic
eligibility continues if the person would be eligible for SSI under present eligibility
standards if Social Security cost of living expenses since April 1977 are disregarded.31
4
The Section 1619(b) Program. This
provides Medicaid for individuals who lose SSI benefits because earnings become too high
to continue receiving cash benefits. Under
1619(b) criteria, automatic Medicaid will continue if the person would continue to be
eligible for SSI if the wages were ignored and if annual income is less than a specified
income threshold.32 The 1619(b) eligibility
thresholds will usually change each year and will vary state by state.33
The Medically Needy Program, often referred to as a spend down, is an
option exercised by approximately two thirds of the states.
Medically needy individuals are those who would qualify for Medicaid, including
individuals who are disabled, but have income or resources above limits set by their
state.34 Since Medicaid eligibility workers often do not
explain the spend down program to applicants or recipients, it is important that you find
out if your state offers this option and take steps to educate yourself on how it works. At a minimum, you should keep up to date on your
state's medically needy income eligibility levels for various sized families.
How does the spend down work? Each
state will set its own medically needy income level based on family size. All individuals meeting the federal (i.e., SSI)
definition of disability, who have income and resources below their state's medically
needy level, automatically qualify for Medicaid.
Individuals with income above the medically needy level do not automatically
qualify for Medicaid. They must first meet a
spend down or share of cost test.
The spend down is the amount by which the individual's income exceeds the medically
needy level after subtracting allowable deductions. Consider
this example: In New York, which has a 2002 one-person medically needy level of $634 per
month, a single adult with a disability receives a monthly SSDI check of $754. Since this exceeds the state's medically needy
level of $634, the Medicaid agency will disregard the first $20 as an unearned income
exclusion and the individual will face a $100 spend down (i.e., their countable income
exceeds the medically needy level by $100). The
spend down acts like a deductible or insurance premium that must be paid or incurred
before the insurance program, i.e., Medicaid, begins coverage.
The optional Medicaid Buy-In Program is an important way for
individuals with disabilities to obtain or retain Medicaid coverage when they are working. It is designed to provide health insurance to
working people with disabilities who, because of relatively high earnings, cannot qualify
for Medicaid under another provision. The buy-in was originally made available as part of
the federal Balanced Budget Act of 1997. The
enhancements to this optional program have been touted as some of the more important
provisions of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999. As this document is written, approximately 15
states had adopted and were implementing buy-in programs, with an additional 20 or more
states at various stages of pre-implementation (including several that had been adopted
and were awaiting federal approval, and several pending in state legislatures). You may wish to check the status of the buy-in
program in your state.
The buy-in program is most important to those individuals with disabilities who
have significant health care needs that cannot be met through employer-sponsored health
benefits plans and have no ability to obtain or retain Medicaid when working for
significant wages. Most often, the group that
will benefit most will be recipients of SSDI, who were not simultaneously eligible for SSI
and, thus, cannot qualify for Medicaid under the section 1619(b) program. Many of these individuals currently receive
Medicaid through medically needy programs and could not afford to work if it meant giving
up Medicaid as the source of payment for expensive items like prescription drugs, personal
assistance services, and durable medical equipment (i.e., AT). In those states that have implemented buy-in
programs, eligibility for Medicaid can continue in many cases at annual wage levels
exceeding $40,000.
Subject to federal criteria, a state can choose to structure the buy-in as it sees
fit. Largely due to fears of rising Medicaid
costs, only five or six states had initiated buy-in programs when the Ticket to Work and
Work Incentives Improvement Act (TWWIIA) was signed into law in December 1999. TWWIIA sought to make the program more attractive
to states.
Key federal eligibility criteria for the original, 1997 buy-in include:
1 Eligible individuals must be in a family whose net income is less than 250 percent of the federal poverty level. A single individual is in a family of one.
2 Except for the individual's earnings, the person with a disability would be considered eligible for SSI benefits. This includes the definition of disability.
3 Each state determines its own definition of a family.
4 All SSI exclusions apply to the determination of family income, including the earned income exclusions.
5 Individuals are not required to have been on SSI to be eligible for this new Buy-In provision.
6 The State must make a disability determination if an individual was not an SSI recipient.
7 Substantial gainful activity (i.e., in 2002 earnings in excess of $780 monthly) is not an eligibility consideration.
8 States can increase the resource limits to as high as $14,000.
9 States can charge premiums or other cost-sharing charges.
The 1999 TWWIIA legislation builds on the 1997 legislation, adding provisions that
make it more attractive to states:
1 It allows states to offer a Medicaid buy-in to persons with disabilities who work and have earnings between 250 and 450 percent of the federal poverty level.
2 Participating states are allowed to set income limits and require cost-sharing and premiums, based on income, on a sliding scale. A state could require some individuals to pay the full premium as long as the premiums do not exceed 7.5 percent of the individual's total income.
3 States must require a 100 percent premium payment for individuals with adjusted gross incomes greater than $75,000 unless states choose to subsidize the premium using their own funds.
B. Eligibility for AT Through Medicaid
The categories of service covered by Medicaid will vary greatly from state to
state. This is because the majority of
Medicaid service categories are optional. A
state must cover all required categories of service, such as inpatient
hospital care and home health care services for persons eligible for skilled nursing
services. A state may choose which of
approximately 30 optional categories of service to cover.
Typically, state Medicaid programs have covered AT under one or more of the
following coverage categories: home health care (which includes medical supplies and
equipment, commonly referred to as durable medical equipment), prosthetic
devices, physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), speech therapy,35
rehabilitative services, and transportation. With
the exception of home health care, all of these categories are optional for adults,
meaning that some states will cover them and some will not.
Children under age 21 are covered under a special mandatory program, known as the
Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program. Under federal Medicaid law, a state is required
through its EPSDT program to cover all of the required and optional services for
Medicaid-eligible children under age 21 even if some of those optional categories are not
covered for adults.36 The statutory language,
governing EPSDT, would seem to support a very expansive view of when a child will receive
AT under the EPSDT program. A service must be
covered for a child if it is among the required or optional services and is
necessary . . . to correct or ameliorate defects and physical and mental illnesses
and conditions.37
C. Sharon's Eligibility for AT
Sharon will become eligible for SSI disability benefits at age 18. Her parents' income and resources will no longer be
counted against her and her SSI payment will be based on her own income and resources. She will then become Medicaid-eligible in those
states in which Medicaid is automatic for SSI recipients.
In other states, she may be eligible under the medically needy program, with or
without a spend down. Once eligibility is
established, she will be eligible through EPSDT for coverage under all of the required and
optional service categories. This will provide
the maximum possibilities for coverage of the AT-related items she is seeking.
Every state's Medicaid program should cover the power wheelchair and AAC
device if Sharon can show that they are medically necessary. Typically, these
items would be covered as durable medical equipment. The
AAC device has also been covered in some states as a prosthetic device or under the
equipment clause of the speech therapy category. Some
Medicaid decision makers will balk at approving the power wheelchair, claiming that she
can get around in most environments with her lightweight, manual wheelchair. In some states, Sharon may need to appeal (see
below) to establish that the power wheelchair is needed to meet all of her mobility needs,
particularly as she begins spending time on a college campus within a hilly community.
The ceiling track lift could also be covered under Medicaid's durable
medical equipment category. The controversy
here will not focus on whether a lifting device is needed; instead, some Medicaid programs
may argue that a less costly, stationary lifting device can meet her needs. Again, Sharon may need to appeal to establish her
right to the preferred ceiling track lift. In
any case in which a Medicaid agency seeks to limit the person to the less expensive
device, it will be critical to have the supporting documents from doctors and other health
professionals address why the lesser item falls short of meeting the person's needs. If a Medicaid-funded personal care aide is needed
to operate the stationary lift, but is not needed to operate the ceiling track lift, that
may help show that the stationary lift is actually a more expensive alternative in the
long run.
The access ramp for the home is an item that many Medicaid programs
will balk at funding. A typical response will
be to say that it is not primarily medical in nature or is a matter of convenience rather
than a medical necessity. The authors are
aware of several cases, in different states, in which access ramps or stair glides within
the home have been approved following a hearing. In
some states, a separate Medicaid waiver program may cover a range of home modifications as
an exception to general rules for those who qualify for the waiver.
A Medicaid program would not be expected to pay for a laptop computer, its
accessories, or the van. These are not
items one thinks of as meeting a medical purpose or as being medically necessary. Keep in mind, however, that there are several dual
purpose AAC devices on the market that double as laptop computers. Often, these are no more expensive and sometimes
less expensive than dedicated AAC devices that meet the same communication needs. Unlike Medicare,38 most state
Medicaid programs will pay for dual purpose devices, especially when they are the least
costly alternative for meeting the individual's communication needs. We can also expect state Medicaid programs to balk
at paying for the van modifications. However,
we are aware of two hearing decisions from New York and an unreported court decision from
Colorado in which vehicle modifications were approved to meet the needs of either a driver
or a passenger with a disability.
Medicaid Waivers Can Fund AT
Individuals with disabilities and their advocates should not be too quick to rule
out potential funding of items which appear to fall outside the scope of Medicaid. Every state will have one or more special waiver
programs, typically referred to as Home and Community Based Services Waivers. These waivers, which are optional, will vary
greatly from state to state. When approved by
the federal Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA),39 a state
is permitted under a waiver to provide a range of services, to special populations, that
are not available to Medicaid recipients generally.40
Many states, through Medicaid waivers, will provide a range of very expensive
services if they are necessary to keep a person in the community and out of an
institution. These typically include a range
of home modifications, including ramps, lifts, stair glides, and other items, that are a
challenge to obtain through the standard Medicaid program.
One of New York's waiver programs will, under limited circumstances, pay for van
modifications if they are needed for the transport of a child with a disability in a van
owned by the parent or parents.41 Since no
two states will operate identical waiver programs, the individual or their advocate must
investigate to determine what waivers are available in their state.
D. Appealing Medicaid Decisions
Requests for funding of AT will typically go through a prior approval process. If the request for funding is denied, federal law
requires that the Medicaid recipient be given a written notice that details the reasons
for the denial and informs the recipient of his or her right to a fair hearing.42 A fair hearing must be available to any individual
whose prior approval request is denied or not acted upon in a reasonably prompt manner. An individual who is denied AT through a Medicaid
waiver program is also entitled to a written notice of the decision and the right to a
hearing to challenge that decision.
State Medicaid agencies must inform recipients of the method to obtain a hearing
and the ability to be represented by an attorney or other representative. Since the time limits for requesting a hearing will
vary from state to state, it is critical to read the denial notice for an explanation of
these time limits. The Medicaid recipient has
the right to be represented by an attorney or advocate, or can proceed without a
representative. As with all the administrative
hearings described in this article, the individual has the right to call witnesses,
present written evidence, and confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses. The federal regulations require that the hearing
decision be issued within 90 days.
Medicare is the nation's largest health services funding program. This federal health insurance program covers three
primary classes of recipients:
1 persons age 65 or older
2 persons receiving SSDI payments (including many adults with developmental disabilities who receive SSDI on the earnings record of a parent, and many who receive SSDI as widows or widowers)
3 persons with end stage renal disease
There
is also a class of Medicare-Qualified Federal Employees who can qualify for benefits.43 SSDI recipients who have exhausted their nine-month
trial work period can continue to qualify for Medicare, even if they cease eligibility for
SSDI cash benefits, during a 93-month extended period of Medicare coverage.44 During the extended coverage period, the individual
can receive Medicare under the same terms as described below (i.e., cost-free Part A
coverage; optional Part B coverage, with a premium). After
the end of the extended coverage period, the individual can pay for coverage under the
Premium-Hospital Insurance for Disabled Working Individuals program.45
Medicare is divided into two parts, known as Part A and Part B. Medicare Part A,
known as hospital insurance, covers inpatient care, nursing home care, hospice care, home
health services and durable medical equipment. For
most Medicare beneficiaries, there is no premium required to obtain Part A coverage. Medicare Part B, known as supplemental
medical insurance, covers various outpatient services, including physician services,
durable medical equipment, prosthetic and orthotic devices, and home health services. To enroll in Part B, a Medicare beneficiary must
pay a monthly premium ($54 in 2002). State
Medicaid programs may pay the Part B premiums for persons with low income. This usually is done through the Qualified Medicare
Beneficiaries (QMB) or Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary (SLMB) programs.
Most Medicare recipients receive benefits through the traditional
Medicare program. Generally, this means that
they are to obtain benefits and then submit claims to a company which contracts with
Medicare to oversee the claims reimbursement process.
A minority of Medicare recipients receive benefits through a managed
care option, now referred to as the Medicare+Choice program. The managed care option exists in most parts of the
country and is run through any number of local or regional health maintenance
organizations. The managed care option, as it
relates to claims for AT coverage (see section B, below), is subject to a prior approval
process.
The facts indicate that Sharon, at age 17, receives Social Security survivor's
benefits on her deceased father's Social Security record.
Moving forward in time, we can assume that Sharon will cease to be eligible for
survivor's benefits when she graduates from high school as an 18 year old. At that time, based on her severe physical
disability, she should qualify for SSDI benefits as a Disabled Adult Child. After 24 months of eligibility for SSDI, she will
then become eligible for Medicare.
B. Eligibility for AT Through Medicare
Medicare, through its Part B benefit, will cover AT devices, such as the power
wheelchair or AAC device sought by Sharon, under its durable medical equipment (DME)
coverage category. Medicare has a four-part
definition for DME. It is defined as equipment
which:
1 can withstand repeated use;
2 is primarily and customarily used to serve a medical purpose;
3 generally is not useful to a person in the absence of an illness or injury; and
4 is appropriate for use in the home.
When Medicare covers DME, it pays for 80 percent of a Medicare approved rate. The 20 percent co-payment would be Sharon's
obligation, but it could be covered through Medicaid if she is also eligible for that
program. The co-payment could also be covered
by a private insurance program. The Medicare approved rate is sometimes
less than what the vendor traditionally charges for a piece of DME. If the DME vendor agrees to accept the lower
approved rate, then the individual will owe 20 percent of the approved rate. However, if the vendor refuses to accept that rate,
then the individual could owe far more than 20 percent of the purchase price.
The DME vendor should be familiar with Medicare's process for approving payment. In traditional Medicare (the majority of cases),
one of four DME Regional Carriers (DMERCs) will be responsible for claims. In the optional managed care or Medicare+Choice
program, all claims will be subject to a prior approval process with claims submitted to
the HMO through which the individual is enrolled.
The Medicare Coverage Issues Manual, maintained by HCFA, contains a DME
reference list.46 The list contains the names of more than 100 pieces
of DME and then indicates either 1) that the item is covered, and under what
circumstances it can be approved; or 2) that the item must be denied. For example, the reference list provides that power
wheelchairs are covered if the person would be unable to propel a manual
wheelchair, a criteria that Sharon should be able to meet.
It would be important, however, that any medical letters submitted to support the
request indicate that Sharon needs the power wheelchair for all significant mobility, not
just for travel on the college campus.
Readers must be cautioned that many of these coverage status listings are binding
only on decision makers prior to the administrative law judge (ALJ) level of appeal. So, for example, AAC devices, which
historically appeared on the reference list as augmentative communication
device or communicator, had a coverage status listed as deny -
convenience item; not primarily medical in nature.
Notwithstanding that status, an ALJ was not bound by that policy and we are aware
of more than 10 ALJ decisions in which the decision awarded funding for an AAC device. It is only as of 2001 that Medicare officially
covers AAC devices.47 Under that new policy, Sharon should be eligible
for Medicare funding of the AAC device because she cannot effectively communicate without
one.
There will be AT devices which appear to meet Medicare's DME definition and do not
appear on the reference list. In those cases,
the decision maker is authorized to approve funding on a case by case basis if the item is
reasonable and necessary for the individual.
The ceiling track lift would appear to fit into this category, as
this category of DME does not appear on the list. Sharon's
best argument is that the lift performs the same mobility or travel function as the
wheelchair, cane, crutches, or walker which are all covered to allow the individual to
ambulate.
It is clear that Medicare will not cover the laptop computer, the van or the
van modifications. The laptop computer
does not meet that part of the DME definition that requires that the item be
primarily and customarily used to serve a medical purpose.48 Regarding the van and modifications, since part of
the definition of DME requires that an item be appropriate for use in the
home, even the van modifications (which, arguably, are medical equipment) cannot be
covered under Medicare's DME category.
A better argument can be made for Medicare to cover the access ramps, but Medicare has traditionally not covered items like ramps, and stairway elevators specifically appear on the reference list as non-covered convenience items that are not considered medical in nature. Since the authors are aware of at least one case in which funding for a stair lift was awarded on appeal, Sharon could be encouraged to seek funding for the ramp in an appeal.
C. Appealing Medicare Decisions
The appeals system governing Medicare denials for DME coverage will vary slightly, depending on whether an individual is covered through the traditional program or through the managed care option. The time periods for requesting appeals will also vary depending on the level at which the most recent decision was made. For these reasons, the consumer or his/her advocate should carefully read the denial notice for instructions on how to appeal and the time limits for doing so.
The charts below detail the different rules governing Medicare appeals. Again, when in doubt, the safest course of action
is to follow the appeal instructions in the denial letter.
TIMELINES
AND MONETARY THRESHOLDS FOR MEDICARE DECISION MAKING & APPEALS PROCESS FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
(NON-HMO PARTICIPANTS) |
|||
Decision Making Level |
Time Limit for Request |
Time Limit for Decision |
Monetary Threshold in Dispute |
Initial Determination [DMERC] |
--- |
60 days |
--- |
Reconsideration [DMERC] |
6 months after Initial |
45 days |
--- |
Carrier Hearing [DMERC] |
6 months after Reconsideration decision |
60-120 days |
$100 or more |
ALJ Hearing |
60 days after Carrier |
no time limit, expect about 2-3 months |
$500 or more |
Departmental Appeal Board |
60 days after ALJ |
no time limit, expect about 6-9 months or
longer |
$500 or more |
Judicial Review [Federal Court Judge] |
60 days after Departmental Appeal Board decision |
none |
$1,000 or more |
MEDICARE
DECISION MAKING & APPEALS PROCESS FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT |
|||
Decision Making Level & Decision Maker |
Time Limit for
Request |
Time Limit for
Decision |
Monetary Threshold
in Dispute |
Initial
Determination |
--- |
14 days |
--- |
Reconsideration [HMO, M+C
Organization] |
60 days after
Initial Determination |
30 days |
--- |
Reconsideration
[Center for Health Dispute Resolution - CHDR] |
Review is
automatic. reconsideration |
30 days |
--- |
ALJ Hearing [Administrative
Law Judge] |
60 days after CHDR decision |
no time limit,
expect about 2-3 months after hearing |
$100 or more |
Departmental
Appeal Board |
60 days after ALJ
decision |
no time
limit,expect about 6-9 months or longer |
$100 or more |
Judicial Review [Federal Court
Judge] |
60 days after
Departmental Appeal Board decision |
none |
$1,000 or more |
MEDICARE DECISION
MAKING & APPEALS PROCESS FOR DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT |
|||
Decision
Making Level |
Time Limit for
Request |
Time Limit for
Decision |
Monetary Threshold in Dispute |
Initial
Determination [Managed Care
Organization] |
--- |
60 days |
--- |
Reconsideration [Managed Care
Org.] |
60 days after
Initial Determination |
60 days |
--- |
Reconsideration
[Center for Health Dispute Resolution] |
Review is
automatic No need to request
reconsideration |
30 days |
--- |
ALJ Hearing |
60 days after CHDR decision |
no time limit,
expect about 2-3 months after hearing |
$100 or more |
Departmental
Appeal Board |
60 days after ALJ
decision |
no time limit,
expect about 6-9 months or longer |
$100 or more |
Judicial Review [Federal Court
Judge] |
60 days after
Departmental Appeal Board
decision |
none |
$1,000 or more |
SSI is a needs-based program. An SSI
recipient must have limited income and limited resources.50 The PASS allows a person with a disability to
exclude income and/or resources, which would otherwise be countable under SSI, when the
excluded money is to be used for some occupational objective.51 By doing so, the person retains SSI, becomes
eligible for more SSI, or becomes eligible for SSI as a new applicant.
The PASS enables an individual to achieve an occupational objective, i.e.,
self-support, through use of this excluded income and resources. For example, the PASS may enable a person to secure
education or training needed to become self-supporting, to make the transition into
employment, or to set up a business. In a case
like Sharon's, the PASS can be used to purchase items like the van or laptop computer if
those items will help pave the way to her vocational goals.
The proposed PASS must be submitted to SSA in writing, preferably using SSA Form
545.52 Chances for approval are enhanced if great care is
taken to document fully, on SSA's form, the person's needs and the viability of the
proposal as a means of attaining self-support. Anyone,
including the SSI applicant or recipient, can write a PASS.
The authors recommend involvement of an advocate or other trained specialist in
writing the PASS.
A number of items must be contained in the written PASS, including:53
1
a designated occupational objective;
2
specific savings/planned disbursement goals directly related to the objective;
3
a list of items or activities requiring savings or payments and anticipated
amounts;
4
a specific period of time for achieving the objective;
5
identification and segregation of any money or other resources being accumulated
and conserved; and
6
a detailed business plan when self-employment is a goal.
A PASS can generally be approved for up to 48 months.54 A PASS may be extended beyond the 48 month limit,
in intervals up to six months, as necessary to allow the person to achieve his or her
goal.55 The allowance for any number of six-month
extensions will help persons who, because of a disability, cannot complete a typical
college program in four years. The extensions
can also help individuals, like Sharon, whose vocational goal requires a Master's or
professional degree program.
The money set
aside under a PASS can be used for anything that can be specifically tied to achieving an
occupational objective.56 Just as
there are limitless ways that people make money, there is no real limit on the types of
proposals that can be approved.
In recent years, there has been an increase in the uses of technology, including
AT, and other creative approaches to allow persons with disabilities to achieve
self-support. Advocates should not be shy
about encouraging individuals to use the PASS for funding creative approaches to
self-support, including the use of cutting edge technology.
Legislative history to the 1972 Social Security Act amendments indicates that the
provision in the law for the PASS should be liberally construed if necessary to accomplish
the self-support objective.57
The following is a nonexclusive list of uses for the income or resources set aside
under the PASS. Any of these items can be
funded if reasonable and necessary to achieve the individual's vocational goal:58
1
Attendant care
2
Basic living skills training related to the work goal
3
Child care
4
Costs for room and board when attending educational, training, employment, trade,
or business activities
5
Dues and subscriptions for publications for academic or professional purposes
6
Equipment, supplies, operating capital and inventory required to establish and
carry on a trade or business
7
Equipment/tools either specific to the individual's condition or designed for
general use
8
Meals consumed during work hours
9
Operational or access modifications to buildings, vehicles, etc., to accommodate
disabilities
10
Tuition, books, supplies and all fees and costs imposed by or in connection with an
educational or occupational training facility including tutoring, testing, counseling,
etc.
11
Uniforms, specialized clothing, safety equipment and appropriate attire (e.g.,
suits and dresses) for job interviews or working in an office or professional setting
12
Maintenance costs for any of the above items
13
Transportation costs, including: lease, rental or purchase of vehicle, subject to
the limitations on installment payments,59 public transportation and common
carriers, fuel costs, registration fees and initial cost of insurance premiums
14
Job coaching/counseling services
15
Job search or relocation services
16
Preparation fees for developing a PASS (but fees for monitoring a PASS are not allowed)
17
Taxes and government-imposed user fees (e.g., permits, licenses) connected with
obtaining any of the above
18
Finance and service charges connected with obtaining any of the above
It should be emphasized that most of the items listed as fundable through the PASS
are potentially fundable through other means. Much
of what is listed can be funded through a state VR agency.60 Much of what is medically related can be funded
through Medicaid or Medicare.61 Availability
of various other educational grants and loans should also be explored. The person should be advised to look to the PASS as
a source of supplemental funding for these items, or as the source of funding for items
that generally cannot be funded through other means.
The easiest
way to understand how the PASS works is to look at Sharon's case. Since the income of Sharon's parents, including her
stepparent, will count until her 18th birthday,62 we should
consider the PASS to take effect on or after her 18th birthday (i.e., December
of her senior year). If the facts do not
change, Sharon may be eligible for an SSI check to supplement her $420 SSDI check (e.g., a
$145 SSI check in a state that does not supplement the 2002 federal benefit rate of $545
per month).
Sharon needs a specially modified van in order to pursue her career goal of
becoming a lawyer. In fact, all of the needed
items could potentially be funded under a PASS if Sharon can show that they are necessary
to achieve her vocational goal. The vehicle
purchase, however, is the one item for which she may have to rely on the PASS. If she buys a van, the VR agency will most likely
be able to pay for most, if not all, of the special modifications needed.63
Sharon decides to set up a PASS to help fund the purchase of a van, proposing, as
of her 18th birthday, to deposit $400 of her monthly SSDI check into a
specially-designated account. As noted above,
under SSI regulations and policy, Sharon can save money under an approved PASS for up to
48 months, or for a longer period if individually approved.
In this case, Sharon chooses a period of 48 months for the PASS. She will then use the money toward purchase of a
van, in order to pursue her occupational objective. Under
SSI regulations, the money in the special bank account will not be considered a countable
resource.64 In addition, the $400 of her SSDI that is set aside
will not be countable income for SSI purposes. Therefore,
her SSI payment will be increased to $545. Thus,
in 48 months' time, without affecting the amount of her disposable income for monthly
living expenses, Sharon will be able to accumulate $19,200 plus interest, possibly enough
to pay for the van and the first year's insurance premium.
In a state that pays the 2002 SSI federal benefit rate (FBR), with no state
supplement, this is how Sharon's SSI check would be calculated:
Total Income:
Total Expenses for PASS:
$420 unearned
$400 per month
$ 0 earned
SSI Calculation:
$420 Unearned income
- 400 PASS expense
20
- 20 Unearned income exclusion
$ 0 Total countable income
$545 SSI federal benefit rate
- 0 Countable income
$545 Total SSI check
In the above example, the PASS will enable Sharon to achieve a number of things:
1 accumulation of more than $19,000 toward the purchase of a vehicle;
2 the leveraging of $10,000 or more from her state VR agency to pay for van modifications;
3 maintenance of monthly income, for living expenses, at or near the same level;65
4
retaining automatic eligibility for Medicaid in most states (ensuring
a continued funding source for AT and many other items); and under various public and
subsidized housing programs and the food stamp program, ability to disregard income set
aside under a PASS.66
D. Using "Deemed Income" to Fund a Vocational Objective: PASSes for Spouses and Children
If the income of a spouse or parent is high enough, a part of that income will be
considered available to the SSI applicant or recipient.
In determining the SSI eligibility of a married person, part of the income of an
ineligible spouse is deemed available to and considered as income of that married person. Similarly, part of the income of an ineligible
parent or stepparent is deemed available to and considered as income of a child under 18
years old.67 In Sharon's case, a part of her parents' $60,000 in
annual wages would be deemed available to her and make her ineligible for SSI. Like any other form of income that is considered
available to an SSI recipient, deemed income can be used to fund items in a PASS.
Let's change the facts in Sharon's case. Assume she is 16 years old and lives with her
mother and 12 year old brother. There is no
other parent in the household. She was getting
a full $545 SSI check until her mother went to work. The
countable deemed income is now $50 over the monthly limit for SSI -- i.e., the deemed
income is $595 per month in a state that pays the 2002 federal benefit rate of $545 per
month. Accordingly, Sharon will no longer be
eligible for SSI.68
A PASS is proposed to put $595 of the mother's monthly wage into an account to save
for the van to allow Sharon to attend college to prepare to become a lawyer. When the PASS is approved, the deemed income will
no longer be counted by SSI and Sharon will qualify once again for a $545 SSI check. She will also remain qualified for Medicaid. If Sharon saves this money for two full years, or
until deeming stops on her eighteenth birthday,69 she will be able to save nearly $14,000
in her PASS fund. She may also wish to put
into the PASS account any lump sum she received for retroactive eligibility if she was
recently approved for SSI following an appeal.
In Sharon's case, the PASS can also be used to fund any number of other items which
specifically relate to her long-term vocational goal.
For example, she may wish to save money toward the specially-adapted computer
equipment or a specially-designed school desk and seating system.
Unfortunately, the PASS has been ignored as a way to use deemed income to fund
items related to a person's vocational goal. For
example, based on statistics compiled by SSA, as of June 2001 there was only one PASS in
existence, nationwide, for a child under age 18 that involved the exclusion of income.70 It is unclear if that PASS involved the use of
deemed income to fund the child's vocational goal. Hopefully,
that number will go up dramatically as we all look to the PASS as an option for children
under age 18.
E. Appeals - What if a PASS Proposal is Denied?
The denial of a PASS proposal, or any
part of the proposal, is considered a decision affecting the right to SSI benefits and is
subject to the SSI appeals process. This
involves three potential appeals before the SSA (reconsideration, administrative law judge
hearing and Appeals Council) and a potential appeal to the federal district court. Following any adverse decision (i.e., denial of the
proposal, or the denial following a reconsideration or hearing), the PASS applicant is
allowed 60 days from receipt of that decision to request an appeal or review of the most
recent decision.
The first level of appeal, reconsideration, is before a person at SSA who played no
part in the initial denial. That appeal can be
on papers only or it can be through a face-to-face meeting.
The hearing level appeal is before an administrative law judge who is independent
of the decision makers who previously denied the PASS proposal. At the hearing, the judge will accept written
documents, and testimony of the PASS applicant and any witnesses. The Appeals Council level of appeal is a paper
review typically based on the hearing decision, any evidence and testimony from the
hearing, and any written arguments submitted on behalf of the person appealing.
This article has provided numerous examples of how AT can help a person overcome
the affects of their disability on the road to work. We
have also discussed five key, federally-sponsored programs that are potential funding
sources for the AT devices and services that Sharon, in the hypothetical, would need to
take all the steps necessary to achieve her final vocational goal. The five funding sources discussed will exist in
every state and, with the exception of the options for states under Medicaid, the federal
requirements governing the programs will be the same in every state.71
There are many other potential funding sources for AT not discussed in this
article. These include private health
insurance plans, the federally-sponsored State Children's Health Insurance Program,
state-specific programs, and charities. There
are also SSI work incentives, in addition to the PASS, that could be used to help fund AT
devices like those sought by Sharon. These
include both impairment related work expenses and blind work expenses as exclusions from
earned income.72 Enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, such as
the Americans with Disabilities Act or section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, can also
help to overcome the barriers that often exist for persons with disabilities in public
transportation systems, colleges, and places of employment.
Specifically, enforcing those laws can establish the right to AT-related
interventions to enable persons with disabilities to move into the world of work.
Individuals who work for a BPA&O project or PABSS program can play a critical role in helping SSI or SSDI recipients to identify potential AT funding sources that will help them overcome barriers to employment. If the AT funding request is denied, they can advise the individual on appeal procedures and direct them to an attorney or advocate who can represent them in the appeal. Some PABSS programs may decide to represent individuals in these appeals when the AT in question will help the person overcome a barrier to work.73 Other PABSS programs and BPA&O projects may wish to refer the individual to one of the other Protection and Advocacy (P&A) programs, such as the P&A for Assistive Technology program.
1A listing of the abbreviations and
acronyms used in this article appears in Appendix-A at the end of this article.
242 U.S.C. § 1320b-19(a)(4)(emphasis
added). The term durable medical equipment,
which is used by Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance plans, encompasses a wide range
of equipment that meets the definitions of AT referenced in this article. See, Introduction, section II. and notes 6
and 7.
3Id. § 1320b-19(a)(7).
4Pub. L. 100-407, 102 Stat. 1044,
former 29 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq.
5In 1998, Congress re-authorized this
legislation as the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. §§ 3001 et seq.
629 U.S.C. §§ 3002(3) & (4).
7See definitions for AT devices
and service at 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.5 and 300.6 (special education) and id. §§
361.5(b)(7) and (b)(8)(vocational rehabilitation).
820 U.S.C. §§ 1400, et seq.;
34 C.F.R. Part 300.
9Letter to Goodman, 16 Educ. of
the Handicapped Law Rpts. 1317 (U.S. Dept. of Educ., Office of Spec. Ed. Programs 1990);
34 C.F.R. §300.308.
10See 34 C.F.R. § 300.8(b)
allowing special education students to take AT devices home when that is necessary to
ensure they benefit from their education.
11Some states have enacted laws or
policies that allow for joint purchase (i.e., by the special education program and VR
agency) or transfer of ownership (i.e., purchase of used item by state VR agency) upon the
student's graduation. See Letter to Goodman
II, 30 Indiv. with Disabilities Educ. Law Rpts. 611 (U.S. Dept. of Educ., Office of
Spec Educ. Programs, 6/21/98)(authorizing states to arrange for the transfer of AT from
the special education system to the VR system for the former student's continued use).
12See, e.g., Letter to J. Stoher,
13 Educ. for the Handicapped Law Rpts. 213:211 (U.S. Dept. of Educ., Office of Spec. Educ.
Programs, 4/20/89).
13 29 U.S.C. § 794; 34 C.F.R. Part
104.
1434 C.F.R. §104.36.
15Letter to Zirkel, 22 Indiv.
with Disabilities Educ. Law Rpts. 667 (U.S. Dept. of Educ., Office of Spec. Educ.
Programs, 5/15/95).
16For the law and regulations
governing state VR agencies, see 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq.; 34 C.F.R. Part
361. For a more comprehensive article on this
topic, with extensive citations to the law and regulations, see Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Available to Prepare Individuals with Disabilities for Work,
published by Cornell University's Northeast Work Incentives Support Center in 2001.
1729 U.S.C. § 701(b)(1)(emphasis
added).
1866 Fed. Reg. 4419.
19Id. at 4426.
20See Rehabilitation Services
Administration, Policy Directive, RSA-PD-92-02 (11/21/91).
2166 Fed. Reg. 4419.
22The reader should keep in mind that
SSI and SSDI recipients are exempt from the VR agency's financial needs test, if it has
one. Based on the assumed facts, Sharon will
become eligible for SSI at age 18 (see section III.B, below), making her exempt
from any financial needs test.
23As discussed in section III, below,
a dual purpose laptop computer/AAC device can be funded by most state Medicaid programs. Under a new Medicare policy (see section
IV.), the dual purpose device can be funded when the personal computer function, which is
not related to speech production, has been disabled prior to sale.
24Under 2001 federal regulations, a
state VR agency is authorized to purchase a vehicle as a means of transportation. 34 C.F.R. § 361.5(b). To date, however, very few state VR agencies will
purchase or lease a vehicle.
2542 U.S.C. §§ 1396 et seq.
2642 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i).
27Id. § 1396a(f).
28SSA Program Operations Manual
System (POMS) SI 01715.020.
2942 U.S.C. § 1383c(d).
3042 U.S.C. § 1383c(c). For an excellent reference on this issue, see Munger,
J., Categorical Medicaid Eligibility for Recipients of Disabled Adult Child Social
Security Disability Benefits, 29 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 1044 (March 1996).
3142 U.S.C. § 1396a(note); 42 C.F.R.
§ 435.135. For a more detailed explanation of
the Pickle Amendment, see Bonnyman, G. Medicaid Eligibility in a Time Warp, 22 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 120 (June 1988) and Screening
for Medicaid Eligibility Under the Pickle Amendment, 35 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 96
(May-June 2001).
3242 U.S.C. § 1382h; 20 C.F.R. §
416.264 - .269; POMS SI 02302.010 B.
33See POMS SI 02303.200 N. The thresholds can also be found on SSA's web site,
www.ssa.gov.
3442 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(10)(C).
35The optional PT, OT and speech
categories are important because the federal regulations define these categories as
including any necessary supplies and equipment. See
42 C.F.R. § 440.110.
3642 U.S.C. § 1396d(r)(5).
37Id.
38See section IV, below.
39HCFA was recently renamed the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. For
the purposes of this article, we will continue to refer to the agency as HCFA.
40By approving the waiver, HCFA would
be waiving the federal requirements that all Medicaid rules be applied statewide and that
all similarly situated Medicaid recipients receive comparable services.
41See N.Y. State Department of
Health, Administrative Directive, Transmittal # 00 OMM/ADM-4 (May 22, 2000), explaining
the criteria for approving home adaptations and vehicle modifications under the state's
Care at Home I and Care at Home II waiver programs.
42The federal regulations governing
fair hearings are found at 42 CFR §§ 431.200-250.
43SSA's Program Operations Manual
Systems (POMS) HI 00835.001.
4442 U.S.C. § 426(b), as amended by
section 202 of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 (increasing
the period from 39 to 93 months).
45See POMS HI 00801.170 (Part
A), 00805.005 A.1 (Part B).
46See Medicare Coverage Issues
Manual § 60-9. This is also known as
National Coverage Decision 60-9.
47For a more complete discussion of
the new Medicare policy, approving coverage of AAC devices, see the April-May 2001
issue of AT Advocate (the newsletter of the National AT Advocacy Project) on the
Neighborhood Legal Services website at www.nls.org/av/av-0501.htm. For a regularly updated reference on Medicare
funding of AAC devices, see the website of the Rehabilitation Research Center on
Communication (RERC) at www.aac-rerc.com.
48We note that Medicare's 2001
policy, approving coverage for AAC devices, states that only dedicated devices
will be approved. It will not pay for dual
purpose devices that can double as a personal computer unless the personal computer
functions have been disabled.
49The Plan for Achieving Self-Support
(PASS) is discussed in greater detail in other publications. See Sheldon, J. & Lopez-Soto, E., PASS:
SSI's Plan for Achieving Self Support, 30 CLEARINGHOUSE REV. 1101 (March-April
1997)(also located on the Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc. website at www.nls.org/pass-art.htm);
Benefits Management for Working People with
Disabilities: an Advocate's Manual, ch. 4 (Greater Upstate Law Project,
2002)(containing up-to-date citations and forms).
50See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1100 et
seq. (income) and 416.1201 et seq. (resources).
5142 U.S.C. §§ 1382a(b)(4)(A)(iii)
and (B)(iv), 1382b(a)(4); 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1180 et seq.; POMS SI 00870.001 et
seq.
5220 C.F.R. § 416.1181. SSA's form
545, although not mandatory, should be used by individuals and their advocates to submit
PASS proposals.
5320 C.F.R. § 416.1181; POMS SI
00870.006.
54
20 C.F.R. § 416.1181(d).
55POMS SI 00870.006 D.
5620 C.F.R. § 416.1181(e); POMS SI
00870.025 B.5.
57Pub. L. No. 92-603, 1972 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 4989, 5138; POMS SI
00870.001 A.
58POMS SI E00870.025 B.5.g.
59See SSA's 1997 Emergency
Instructions, EM-97-191, providing that a PASS provision for installment payments can be
approved if the expense is necessary to achieve the vocational goal and cannot be met out
of current income.
60See section II, above.
61See sections III. and IV,
above.
62Under SSI rules, Sharon will be
considered an adult at age 18. Her parents
income will no longer be counted in determining her eligibility.
63See section II.B, above.
64Id. § 416.1180.
65Before the PASS was approved, Sharon's
monthly income available for living expenses was $551, i.e., $420 in SSDI and $131 in SSI
benefits. After the PASS is approved, her
monthly income available for living expenses remains at $551, i.e., $20 of SSI not set
aside for PASS and $531 in SSI benefits.
66See, e.g., 24 C.F.R. §§ 813.106(c)(8)(ii), 913.106(c)(8)(ii)(providing that
money set aside in an approved PASS will not be counted as income in calculating the
tenant's rent contribution). See 7
U.S.C. §§ 2014(d)(16) and (g)(providing a similar exemption in the food stamp program).
67See 20 C.F.R. §§
416.1160(a)(1)(deeming of income from ineligible spouse) and (a)(2)(deeming of income from
ineligible parent).
68Under SSI's complicated deeming
formula, if Sharon, her brother and her mother are the only three persons in their
household, the mother would have to earn $2,637.50 per month ($31,650 per year) in 2002
for $595 to be deemed available to Sharon as countable income.
69Id. § 416.1165
70
See SSI RECIPIENTS WHO WORK, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF RESEARCH, EVALUATION AND STATISTICS (June 2001).
71In special education and state VR
programs, a state or local agency could offer more, but not less than the federal law and
regulations mandate. With Medicare, some HMOs
will offer more, under managed care plans, than federal Medicare law would require. SSI's PASS will operate under the same rules,
nationwide.
72See 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.976
and 416.1112(c)(8).
73Under conditions governing their
funding, a PABSS project is not permitted to be involved in appeals before the Social
Security Administration. This means they would
not be able to represent individuals on appeals concerning PASS denials. PABSS projects would be permitted, subject to grant
conditions, to represent individuals in appeals involving the other programs discussed in
the article.
Return to Table of Contents | NLS Home Page | Feedback | Search the NLS Website