PRACTICAL ETHICS

When Can You Withdraw From a Hearing or Court Case?
When Can You Settle for Less Than the Client Really Wants?

Diana M. Straube, Staff Attorney
Ronald M. Hager, Staff Attorney
National Assistive Technology Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services, Inc.
295 Main Street, Room 495
Buffalo, New York 14203
716-847-0650, 0227 (fax), 1322 (tdd)
dstraube@nls.org * rhager@nls.org
www.nls.org
April 2005

  1. Definition of Tribunal
    1. Model Rules
    2. Rule 1.0 Terminology

      (m) "Tribunal" denotes a court, an arbitrator in a binding arbitration proceeding or a legislative body, administrative agency or other body acting in an adjudicative capacity. A legislative body, administrative agency or other body acts in an adjudicative capacity when a neutral official, after the presentation of evidence or legal argument by a party or parties, will render a binding legal judgment directly affecting a party's interests in a particular matter.

    3. Model Code

    Definitions

    6. "Tribunal" includes all courts and all other adjudicatory bodies.

  2. Withdrawal
    1. Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Model Rules)
    2. RULE 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation

      (a) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer shall not represent a client, or where representation has commenced, shall withdraw from the representation or a client if:

      (1) the representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law;

      (2) the lawyer’s physical or mental condition impairs the lawyer’s ability to represent the client; or

      (3) the lawyer is discharged.

      (b) Except as stated in paragraph (c), a lawyer may withdraw from representing a client if:

      (1) withdrawal can be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client;

      (2) the client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer’s services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent;

      (3) the client has used the lawyer’s services to perpetrate a crime or fraud;

      (4) the client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement;

      (5) the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer regarding the lawyer’s services and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the obligation is fulfilled;

      (6) the representation will result in an unreasonable financial burden on the lawyer or has been rendered unreasonably difficult by the client; or

      (7) other good cause for withdrawal exists.

      (c) A lawyer must comply with applicable law requiring notice to or permission of a tribunal when terminating a representation. When ordered to do so by a tribunal, a lawyer shall continue representation notwithstanding good cause for terminating the representation.

      Comment to Rule 1.6

      Withdrawal

      [14] If the lawyer's services will be used by the client in materially furthering a course of criminal or fraudulent conduct, the lawyer must withdraw, as stated in Rule 1.16(a)(1).

      [15] After withdrawal the lawyer is required to refrain from making disclosure of the clients' confidences, except as otherwise provided in Rule 1.6. Neither this Rule nor Rule 1.8(b) nor Rule 1.16(d) prevents the lawyer from giving notice of the fact of withdrawal, and the lawyer may also withdraw or disaffirm any opinion, document, affirmation, or the like.

    3. Model Code of Professional Conduct (Model Code)
    4. Ethical Consideration (EC) 2-32

      A decision by a lawyer to withdraw should be made only on the basis of compelling circumstances, and in a matter pending before a tribunal he must comply with the rules of the tribunal regarding withdrawal. A lawyer should not withdraw without considering carefully and endeavoring to minimize the possible adverse effect on the rights of his client and the possibility of prejudice to his client as a result of his withdrawal. Even when he justifiably withdraws, a lawyer should protect the welfare of his client by giving due notice of his withdrawal, suggesting employment of other counsel, delivering to the client all papers and property to which the client is entitled, cooperating with counsel, subsequently employed, and otherwise endeavoring to minimize the possibility of harm...

      Disciplinary Rule (DR) 2-110 Withdrawal From Employment

      (A) In general,

      (1) If permission for withdrawal from employment is required by the rules of a tribunal, a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment in a proceeding before that tribunal without its permission;

      (2) In any event, a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his client, including giving due notice to his client, allowing time for employment of other counsel, delivering to the client all papers and property to which the client is entitled, and complying with applicable laws and rules.

      ***

      (B) Mandatory withdrawal,

      A lawyer representing a client before a tribunal, with its permission if required by its rules, shall withdraw from employment, and a lawyer representing a client in other matters shall withdraw from employment, if:

      (1) He knows or it is obvious that his client is bringing the legal action, conducting the defense, or asserting a position in the litigation, or is otherwise having steps taken for him, merely for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person.

      (2) He knows or it is obvious that his continued employment will result in violation of a Disciplinary Rule.

      ***

      (C) Permissive withdrawal.

      If DR 2-110(B) is not applicable, a lawyer may not request permission to withdraw in matters pending before a tribunal, and may not withdraw in other matters, unless such request or such withdrawal is because:

      (1) His client:

      (a) Insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.

      (b) Personally seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct.

      (c) Insists that the lawyer pursue a course of conduct that is illegal or that is prohibited under the Disciplinary Rules.

      (d) By other conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the lawyer to carry out his employment effectively.

      (e) Insists, in a matter not pending before a tribunal, that the lawyer engage in conduct that is contrary to the judgment and advice of the lawyer but not prohibited under the Disciplinary Rules.

      (f) Deliberately disregards an agreement or obligation to the lawyer as to expenses or fees.

      (2) His continued employment is likely to result in a violation of a Disciplinary Rule.

      (3) His inability to work with co-counsel indicates that the best interests of the client likely will be served by withdrawal.

      (4) His mental or physical condition renders it difficult for him to carry out the employment effectively.

      (5) His client knowingly and freely assents to termination of his employment.

      (6) He believes in good faith, in a proceeding before a tribunal, that the tribunal will find the existence of other good cause for withdrawal.

    5. Case Law
      1. "Unreasonably Difficult"
        1. Failure to Respond to Any Communication
        2. Bok v Werner, 780 N.Y.S.2d 332 (1st Dept. 2004)

          Attorney was entitled to withdraw on "unreasonably difficult" grounds where client had failed to respond to any communication from attorney and denial of permission to withdraw amounted to improvident exercise of discretion.

        3. Attorney Had to Seek Approval of Another Attorney
        4. Lasser v Nassau Community College , 457 N.Y.S.2d 343 (2nd Dept. 1983)

          Attorney was entitled to withdraw where he was required to seek approval, as to all future actions regarding the case, of another attorney who was representing client in a closely related matter. Withdrawal was justified because the requirement was tantamount to being superseded by another attorney.

        5. Client Heeding Contrary Advice from Another Attorney
        6. Goldsmith v Pyramid Communications, Inc., 362 F.Supp. 694 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

          A number of defendants united in interest and pleading together, appeared by a single law firm. Counsel worked on a proposed settlement and solicited client approval. Terms of the settlement included waiver and release of all cross-claims, and required consent of all defendants.

          Certain defendants sought separate legal advice as to whether they had a cross-claim against a co-defendant which should not be waived. The attorneys of record sought permission to withdraw on the grounds that these defendants had received advice from competent counsel and now a conflict of interest exists between co-defendants. The separate clients opposed withdrawal.

          At oral argument, the attorneys of record expressed the opinion that the cross-claim lacks merit. While the court acknowledged that this is a totally subjective opinion as to which reasonable lawyers may disagree, under the circumstances of this case, justifiable cause exists to permit withdrawal, in that counsel’s judgment and advice had been disdained as incorrect or improvident and if required to continue, they may be required to maintain a cross-claim they believe has no merit.

        7. Development of Antagonistic Relationship
        8. Barefoot v Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc., 2004 WL 3186307 (E.D.Pa. 2004)

          Court must weigh 4 factors to determine whether withdrawal is appropriate: the reason for which withdrawal is sought; whether withdrawal will prejudice the parties; whether withdrawal will interfere with the administration of justice, and; the degree to which withdrawal will delay the action.

          Here, defendants have been billed but refused to pay for substantial services performed in this case, and defendants have been extremely critical of the services performed. The court held that an irretrievable breakdown in the attorney/client relationship exists, and while mere differences of opinion are not sufficient, the development of an antagonistic relationship is good cause for withdrawal.

        9. Client Questioned Attorney’s Competence, Ethics, Strategy

        Kiernan v Kiernan, 649 N.Y.S.2d 612 (1996)

        Attorney was entitled to withdraw where record demonstrated that client questioned attorney’s competence, strategy and ethics, thereby rendering it unreasonably difficult for the firm to carry out effective employment.

      2. May Not Help Perpetrate Fraud

    National Enterprises Corp. v Reback, 1994 WL 44827 (1994)

    Court found that an attorney, while working on a mortgage transaction, wrote a fraudulent opinion letter to the plaintiff’s, who were potential lenders. In that letter, the attorney failed to disclose that his client was under indictment for arson and insurance fraud and was transacting business under an alias. The court rejected the attorney’s argument that he considered the information to be a confidence or secret and therefore, privileged.

    The trial court held that DR 7-102(B) requires that upon discovering that the client has, in the course of the representation, perpetrated a fraud upon a person, that attorney must promptly call upon his client to rectify the same and if the client is unwilling or unable to do so, the attorney shall do so unless the information if protected as a confidence. The attorney’s only recourse is to then withdraw from representation. Citing NY City 90-2, (1990).

    On appeal, the court reversed and remanded, finding that the trial court erred when instructing the jury that, "as a matter of law," the attorney engaged in professional misconduct by representing the client knowing that he was using an alias. The appeal court did not address the attorney’s failure to mention the arson or insurance fraud. National Enterprises Corp. v. Reback, 219 A.D.2d 484 (1st Dept. 1995).

    ABA Formal Opinion 98-412, September 9, 1998

    A lawyer who discovers that a client has violated a court order prohibiting or limiting the transfer of assets must reveal that fact to the court if necessary to avoid or correct an affirmative representative, or must withdraw from representation if the client refuses to allow disclosure.

  3.   WITHDRAWAL OF LAWYER APPOINTED BY COURT
    1. Model Rules
    2. RULE 6.2 Accepting Appointments

      A lawyer shall not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person except for good cause, such as:

      (a) representing the client is likely to result in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;

      (b) representing the client is likely to result in an unreasonable financial burden of the lawyer; or

      (c) the client or the cause is so repugnant as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer’s ability to represent the client.

      Appointed Counsel (Comment)

      [2] For good cause a lawyer may seek to decline an appointment to represent a person who cannot afford to retain counsel or whose cause is unpopular. Good cause exists if the lawyer could not handle the matter competently, see Rule 1.1, or if undertaking the representation would result in an improper conflict of interest, for example, when the client or the cause is so repugnant to the lawyer as to be likely to impair the client-lawyer relationship or the lawyer's ability to represent the client. A lawyer may also seek to decline an appointment if acceptance would be unreasonably burdensome, for example, when it would impose a financial sacrifice so great as to be unjust.

    3. Model Code
    4. EC 2-29

      When a lawyer is appointed by a court or requested by a bar association to undertake representation of a person unable to obtain counsel, whether for financial or other reasons, he should not seek to be excused from undertaking the representation except for compelling reasons. Compelling reasons do not include such factors as the repugnance of the subject matter of the proceeding, the identity or position of a person involved in the case, the belief of the lawyer that the defendant in a criminal proceeding is guilty, or the belief of the lawyer regarding the merits of the civil case.

    5. Case Law

    McCoy v Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, Dist 1, 486 U.S. 429 (1988)

    Attorney appointed by court to appeal a criminal conviction wrote a brief wherein he advanced four legal arguments for reversal, then stated that further appellate proceedings on behalf of his client would be frivolous and asked for permission to withdraw. The Wisconsin court ordered the brief stricken and directed the attorney to submit a brief explaining why he believed the appeal lacked merit as required by §809.32, Wis. Rules of App. Proc.

    Instead of complying with the directive, the attorney filed an action in state supreme court challenging the constitutionality of the discussion rule in that it forces counsel to violate his or her client’s 6th amendment rights.

    The court held that the discussion requirement was not a violation of the defendant’s 6th amendment rights. An attorney, appointed or retained, is under an ethical obligation to refuse to prosecute a frivolous appeal.

  4.   Meritorious Claims and Defenses
    1. Model Rules
    2. RULE 3.1

      A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law...

      Comment to Rule 3.1

      [1] The advocate has a duty to use legal procedure for the fullest benefit of the client's cause, but also a duty not to abuse legal procedure. The law, both procedural and substantive, establishes the limits within which an advocate may proceed. However, the law is not always clear and never is static. Accordingly, in determining the proper scope of advocacy, account must be taken of the law's ambiguities and potential for change.

      [2] The filing of an action or defense or similar action taken for a client is not frivolous merely because the facts have not first been fully substantiated or because the lawyer expects to develop vital evidence only by discovery. What is required of lawyers, however, is that they inform themselves about the facts of their clients' cases and the applicable law and determine that they can make good faith arguments in support of their clients' positions. Such action is not frivolous even though the lawyer believes that the client's position ultimately will not prevail. The action is frivolous, however, if the lawyer is unable either to make a good faith argument on the merits of the action taken or to support the action taken by a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law.

    3. Model Code

    DR 7-101 Representing a Client Zealously.

    (A) A lawyer shall not intentionally:

    (2) Fail to carry out a contract of employment entered into with a client for professional services, but he may withdraw as permitted under DR 2-110, DR 5-102, and DR 5-105.

    (3) Prejudice or damage his client during the course of the professional relationship, except as required under DR 7-102(B).

    (B) In his representation of a client, a lawyer may:

    (1) Where permissible, exercise his professional judgment to waive or fail to assert a right or position of his client.

    (2) Refuse to aid or participate in conduct that he believes to be unlawful, even though there is some support for an argument that the conduct is legal.

    DR 7-102 Representing a Client Within the Bounds of the Law.

    (A) In his representation of a client, a lawyer shall not:

    (1) File a suit, assert a position, conduct a defense, delay a trial, or take other action on behalf of his client when he knows or when it is obvious that such action would serve merely to harass or maliciously injure another.

    (2) Knowingly advance a claim or defense that is unwarranted under existing law, except that he may advance such claim or defense if it can be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.

    (3) Conceal or knowingly fail to disclose that which he is required by law to reveal.

    (4) Knowingly use perjured testimony or false evidence.

    (5) Knowingly make a false statement of law or fact.

    (6) Participate in the creation or preservation of evidence when he knows or it is obvious that the evidence is false.

    (7) Counsel or assist his client in conduct that the lawyer knows to be illegal or fraudulent.

    (8) Knowingly engage in other illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a Disciplinary Rule.

    (B) A lawyer who receives information clearly establishing that:

    (1) His client has, in the course of the representation, perpetrated a fraud upon a person or tribunal shall promptly call upon his client to rectify the same, and if his client refuses or is unable to do so, he shall reveal the fraud to the affected person or tribunal, except when the information is protected as a privileged communication.

    (2) A person other than his client has perpetrated a fraud upon a tribunal shall promptly reveal the fraud to the tribunal.

  5. Meritless Versus Weak
  6. Rindner v Cannon Mills, Inc., 127 Misc.2d 604 (1985)

    It is prohibited for an attorney to "knowingly advance a claim or defense that is unwarranted under existing law..." DR2-110(C)(1)(a) permits withdrawal if the client insists on presenting such a claim or defense. "When an attorney loses faith in his cause, he should either retire from the case or dismiss the action." (Lorimer v Smith, 103 Cal.App. 98, 101, 19 P.2d 825, 827) An attorneys judgment cannot be the subject of scrutiny unless there is some affirmative evidence of bad faith.

    Vaughn v American Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 1998 WL 760230 (E.D.N.Y. 1998)

    Although the refusal of a client to accept a settlement offer does not amount to good cause for withdrawal and an attorney may not be granted permission to withdraw merely because the attorney believes the case is weaker than he first thought, an attorney may be entitled to withdraw if he believes that is client’s case is so lacking in merit that he cannot, in good faith, present his client’s case to the court.

    Welch v Niagara Falls Gazette, 2000 WL 1737947 (W.D.N.Y. 2000)

    Attorney sought permission to withdraw after his client refused a settlement offer the attorney thought was reasonable. The court held that at attorney may not withdraw simply because he later comes to believe that his client’s case is weaker than his first evaluation. Even when the attorney believes the amount of the potential recovery does not justify a trial, the obligation undertaken by the attorney might require that he continue to represent to trial. Further, a client is not required to follow his attorney’s advice in every instance.

  7. Objectives v. Means
    1. Model Rules
    2. RULE 1.2 Scope of Representation and Allocation Of Authority Between Client and Lawyer

      (a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), a lawyer shall abide by a client's decisions concerning the objectives of representation and, as required by Rule 1.4, shall consult with the client as to the means by which they are to be pursued. A lawyer may take such action on behalf of the client as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation. A lawyer shall abide by a client's decision whether to settle a matter...

      (c) A lawyer may limit the scope of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.

      (d) A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.

      Comments to Rule 1.2: Allocation of Authority between Client and Lawyer

      [1] Paragraph (a) confers upon the client the ultimate authority to determine the purposes to be served by legal representation, within the limits imposed by law and the lawyer's professional obligations. The decisions specified in paragraph (a), such as whether to settle a civil matter, must also be made by the client. See Rule 1.4(a)(1) for the lawyer's duty to communicate with the client about such decisions. With respect to the means by which the client's objectives are to be pursued, the lawyer shall consult with the client as required by Rule 1.4(a)(2) and may take such action as is impliedly authorized to carry out the representation.

      [2] On occasion, however, a lawyer and a client may disagree about the means to be used to accomplish the client's objectives. Clients normally defer to the special knowledge and skill of their lawyer with respect to the means to be used to accomplish their objectives, particularly with respect to technical, legal and tactical matters. Conversely, lawyers usually defer to the client regarding such questions as the expense to be incurred and concern for third persons who might be adversely affected. Because of the varied nature of the matters about which a lawyer and client might disagree and because the actions in question may implicate the interests of a tribunal or other persons, this Rule does not prescribe how such disagreements are to be resolved. Other law, however, may be applicable and should be consulted by the lawyer. The lawyer should also consult with the client and seek a mutually acceptable resolution of the disagreement. If such efforts are unavailing and the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement with the client, the lawyer may withdraw from the representation. See Rule 1.16(b)(4). Conversely, the client may resolve the disagreement by discharging the lawyer. See Rule 1.16(a)(3).

      [4] In a case in which the client appears to be suffering diminished capacity, the lawyer's duty to abide by the client's decisions is to be guided by reference to Rule 1.14.

      [6] The scope of services to be provided by a lawyer may be limited by agreement with the client or by the terms under which the lawyer's services are made available to the client. When a lawyer has been retained by an insurer to represent an insured, for example, the representation may be limited to matters related to the insurance coverage. A limited representation may be appropriate because the client has limited objectives for the representation. In addition, the terms upon which representation is undertaken may exclude specific means that might otherwise be used to accomplish the client's objectives. Such limitations may exclude actions that the client thinks are too costly or that the lawyer regards as repugnant or imprudent.

      [10] When the client's course of action has already begun and is continuing, the lawyer's responsibility is especially delicate. The lawyer is required to avoid assisting the client, for example, by drafting or delivering documents that the lawyer knows are fraudulent or by suggesting how the wrongdoing might be concealed. A lawyer may not continue assisting a client in conduct that the lawyer originally supposed was legally proper but then discovers is criminal or fraudulent. The lawyer must, therefore, withdraw from the representation of the client in the matter. See Rule 1.16(a). In some cases, withdrawal alone might be insufficient. It may be necessary for the lawyer to give notice of the fact of withdrawal and to disaffirm any opinion, document, affirmation or the like. See Rule 4.1.

    3. Model Code
    4. EC 7-7

      In certain areas of legal representation not affecting the merits of the cause or substantially prejudicing the rights of a client, a lawyer is entitled to make decisions on his own. But otherwise the authority to make decisions is exclusively that of the client and, if made within the framework of the law, such decisions are binding on his lawyer. As typical examples in civil cases, it is for the client to decide whether he will accept a settlement offer or whether he will waive his right to plead an affirmative defense...

      EC 7-9

      In the exercise of his professional judgment on those decisions which are for his determination in the handling of a legal matter, a lawyer should always act in a manner consistent with the best interests of his client. However, when an action in the best interest of his client seems to him to be unjust, he may ask his client for permission to forego such action.

    5. Case Law

    Esguerra v State of Alaska, 2005 WL 19220 (2005)

    In appeal, criminal defendant argued that Judge erred in denying his attorney’s motion to withdraw. The defendant wanted his attorney to call certain witnesses and the attorney did not agree. The attorney moved to withdraw claiming his client wanted to pursue a course of action that counsel believed to be imprudent and not in his best interests. The court denied the request, concluding that there was not an irreconcilable conflict of interest between the defendant and his attorney.

    The concurring opinion discusses the decisions left to an attorney as opposed to the client. Trial strategy, such as the identity of witnesses, is a matter for counsel to decide. The client determines the objectives to be pursued while counsel determines the means to achieve the objectives. See Comment to Professional Conduct Rule 1.2(a).

  8.   Communication with Client
    1. Model Rules|
    2. RULE 1.4 Communication

      (a) A lawyer shall:

      (1) promptly inform the client of any decision or circumstance with respect to which the client's informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e), is required by these Rules;

      (2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished;

      (3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;

      (4) promptly comply with reasonable requests for information; and

      (5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer's conduct when the lawyer knows that the client expects assistance not permitted by the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law.

      (b) A lawyer shall explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make informed decisions regarding the representation.

      Comments to Rule 1.4

      [2] If these Rules require that a particular decision about the representation be made by the client, paragraph (a)(1) requires that the lawyer promptly consult with and secure the client's consent prior to taking action unless prior discussions with the client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to take. For example, a lawyer who receives from opposing counsel an offer of settlement in a civil controversy or a proffered plea bargain in a criminal case must promptly inform the client of its substance unless the client has previously indicated that the proposal will be acceptable or unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or to reject the offer. See Rule 1.2(a).

      [3] Paragraph (a)(2) requires the lawyer to reasonably consult with the client about the means to be used to accomplish the client's objectives. In some situations — depending on both the importance of the action under consideration and the feasibility of consulting with the client — this duty will require consultation prior to taking action. In other circumstances, such as during a trial when an immediate decision must be made, the exigency of the situation may require the lawyer to act without prior consultation. In such cases the lawyer must nonetheless act reasonably to inform the client of actions the lawyer has taken on the client's behalf. Additionally, paragraph (a)(3) requires that the lawyer keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, such as significant developments affecting the timing or the substance of the representation.

      [5] The client should have sufficient information to participate intelligently in decisions concerning the objectives of the representation and the means by which they are to be pursued, to the extent the client is willing and able to do so. Adequacy of communication depends in part on the kind of advice or assistance that is involved. For example, when there is time to explain a proposal made in a negotiation, the lawyer should review all important provisions with the client before proceeding to an agreement. In litigation a lawyer should explain the general strategy and prospects of success and ordinarily should consult the client on tactics that are likely to result in significant expense or to injure or coerce others. On the other hand, a lawyer ordinarily will not be expected to describe trial or negotiation strategy in detail. The guiding principle is that the lawyer should fulfill reasonable client expectations for information consistent with the duty to act in the client's best interests, and the client's overall requirements as to the character of representation. In certain circumstances, such as when a lawyer asks a client to consent to a representation affected by a conflict of interest, the client must give informed consent, as defined in Rule 1.0(e).

      [6] Ordinarily, the information to be provided is that appropriate for a client who is a comprehending and responsible adult. However, fully informing the client according to this standard may be impracticable, for example, where the client is a child or suffers from diminished capacity. See Rule 1.14...

    3. Model Code

    EC 7-4

    The advocate may urge any permissible construction of the law favorable to his client, without regard to his professional opinion as to the likelihood that the construction will ultimately prevail. His conduct is within the bounds of the law, and therefore permissible, if the position taken is supported by the law or is supportable by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of the law. However, a lawyer is not justified in asserting a position in litigation that is frivolous.

    EC 7-5

    A lawyer as adviser furthers the interest of his client by giving his professional opinion as to what he believes would likely be the ultimate decision of the courts on the matter at hand and by informing his client of the practical effect of such decision. He may continue in the representation of his client even though his client has elected to pursue a course of conduct contrary to the advice of the lawyer so long as he does not thereby knowingly assist the client to engage in illegal conduct or to take a frivolous legal position. A lawyer should never encourage or aid his client to commit criminal acts or counsel his client on how to violate the law and avoid punishment therefor.

    EC 7-8

    A lawyer should exert his best efforts to insure that decisions of his client are made only after the client has been informed of relevant considerations. A lawyer ought to initiate this decision-making process if the client does not do so. Advice of a lawyer to his client need not be confined to purely legal considerations. A lawyer should advise his client of the possible effect of each legal alternative. A lawyer should bring to bear upon this decision-making process the fullness of his experience as well as his objective viewpoint. In assisting his client to reach a proper decision, it is often desirable for a lawyer to point out those factors which may lead to a decision that is morally just as well as legally permissible. He may emphasize the possibility of harsh consequences that might result from assertion of legally permissible positions. In the final analysis, however, the lawyer should always remember that the decision whether to forego legally available objectives or methods because of non-legal factors is ultimately for the client and not for himself. In the event that the client in a non-adjudicatory matter insists upon a course of conduct that is contrary to the judgment and advice of the lawyer but not prohibited by Disciplinary Rules, the lawyer may withdraw from the employment.

  9.   Maintaining Client Confidences
    1. Model Rules
    2. Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information

      (a) A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client unless the client consents after consultation, except for disclosures that are impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation, and except as stated in paragraph (b).

      (b) A lawyer may reveal such information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary:

      (1) to prevent the client from committing a criminal act that the lawyer believes is likely to result in imminent death or substantial bodily harm; ...

    3. Model Code

    DR 4-101 Preservation of Confidences and Secrets of a Client.

    (A) "Confidence" refers to information protected by the attorney-client privilege under applicable law, and "secret" refers to other information gained in the professional relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client.

    (B) Except when permitted under DR 4-101(C), a lawyer shall not knowingly:

    (1) Reveal a confidence or secret of his client.

    (2) Use a confidence or secret of his client to the disadvantage of the client.

    (3) Use a confidence or secret of his client for the advantage of himself or of a third person, unless the client consents after full disclosure.

    (C) A lawyer may reveal:

    (1) Confidences or secrets with the consent of the client or clients affected, but only after a full disclosure to them.

    (2) Confidences or secrets when permitted under Disciplinary Rules or required by law or court order.

    (3) The intention of his client to commit a crime and the information necessary to prevent the crime.

    (4) Confidences or secrets necessary to establish or collect his fee or to defend himself or his employees or associates against an accusation of wrongful conduct.

    (D) A lawyer shall exercise reasonable care to prevent his employees, associates, and others whose services are utilized by him from disclosing or using confidences or secrets of a client, except that a lawyer may reveal the information allowed by DR 4-101(C) through an employee.

  10. Client with Reduced Capacity
    1. Model Rules
    2.  

      RULE 1.14 Client with Diminished Capacity

      (a) When a client's capacity to make adequately considered decisions in connection with a representation is diminished, whether because of minority, mental impairment or for some other reason, the lawyer shall, as far as reasonably possible, maintain a normal client-lawyer relationship with the client.

      (b) When the lawyer reasonably believes that the client has diminished capacity, is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless action is taken and cannot adequately act in the client's own interest, the lawyer may take reasonably necessary protective action, including consulting with individuals or entities that have the ability to take action to protect the client and, in appropriate cases, seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem, conservator or guardian.

      (c) Information relating to the representation of a client with diminished capacity is protected by Rule 1.6. When taking protective action pursuant to paragraph (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6(a) to reveal information about the client, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to protect the client's interests.

      Comments to Rule 1.14

      [1] The normal client-lawyer relationship is based on the assumption that the client, when properly advised and assisted, is capable of making decisions about important matters. When the client is a minor or suffers from a diminished mental capacity, however, maintaining the ordinary client-lawyer relationship may not be possible in all respects. In particular, a severely incapacitated person may have no power to make legally binding decisions. Nevertheless, a client with diminished capacity often has the ability to understand, deliberate upon, and reach conclusions about matters affecting the client's own well-being. For example, children as young as five or six years of age, and certainly those of ten or twelve, are regarded as having opinions that are entitled to weight in legal proceedings concerning their custody. So also, it is recognized that some persons of advanced age can be quite capable of handling routine financial matters while needing special legal protection concerning major transactions.

      [2] The fact that a client suffers a disability does not diminish the lawyer's obligation to treat the client with attention and respect. Even if the person has a legal representative, the lawyer should as far as possible accord the represented person the status of client, particularly in maintaining communication.

      [3] The client may wish to have family members or other persons participate in discussions with the lawyer. When necessary to assist in the representation, the presence of such persons generally does not affect the applicability of the attorney-client evidentiary privilege. Nevertheless, the lawyer must keep the client's interests foremost and, except for protective action authorized under paragraph (b), must to look to the client, and not family members, to make decisions on the client's behalf.

      [4] If a legal representative has already been appointed for the client, the lawyer should ordinarily look to the representative for decisions on behalf of the client. In matters involving a minor, whether the lawyer should look to the parents as natural guardians may depend on the type of proceeding or matter in which the lawyer is representing the minor. If the lawyer represents the guardian as distinct from the ward, and is aware that the guardian is acting adversely to the ward's interest, the lawyer may have an obligation to prevent or rectify the guardian's misconduct. See Rule 1.2(d).

      Taking Protective Action

      [5] If a lawyer reasonably believes that a client is at risk of substantial physical, financial or other harm unless action is taken, and that a normal client-lawyer relationship cannot be maintained as provided in paragraph (a) because the client lacks sufficient capacity to communicate or to make adequately considered decisions in connection with the representation, then paragraph (b) permits the lawyer to take protective measures deemed necessary. Such measures could include: consulting with family members, using a reconsideration period to permit clarification or improvement of circumstances, using voluntary surrogate decisionmaking tools such as durable powers of attorney or consulting with support groups, professional services, adult-protective agencies or other individuals or entities that have the ability to protect the client. In taking any protective action, the lawyer should be guided by such factors as the wishes and values of the client to the extent known, the client's best interests and the goals of intruding into the client's decisionmaking autonomy to the least extent feasible, maximizing client capacities and respecting the client's family and social connections.

      [6] In determining the extent of the client's diminished capacity, the lawyer should consider and balance such factors as: the client's ability to articulate reasoning leading to a decision, variability of state of mind and ability to appreciate consequences of a decision; the substantive fairness of a decision; and the consistency of a decision with the known long-term commitments and values of the client. In appropriate circumstances, the lawyer may seek guidance from an appropriate diagnostician.

      [7] If a legal representative has not been appointed, the lawyer should consider whether appointment of a guardian ad litem, conservator or guardian is necessary to protect the client's interests. Thus, if a client with diminished capacity has substantial property that should be sold for the client's benefit, effective completion of the transaction may require appointment of a legal representative. In addition, rules of procedure in litigation sometimes provide that minors or persons with diminished capacity must be represented by a guardian or next friend if they do not have a general guardian. In many circumstances, however, appointment of a legal representative may be more expensive or traumatic for the client than circumstances in fact require. Evaluation of such circumstances is a matter entrusted to the professional judgment of the lawyer. In considering alternatives, however, the lawyer should be aware of any law that requires the lawyer to advocate the least restrictive action on behalf of the client.

      Disclosure of the Client's Condition

      [8] Disclosure of the client's diminished capacity could adversely affect the client's interests. For example, raising the question of diminished capacity could, in some circumstances, lead to proceedings for involuntary commitment. Information relating to the representation is protected by Rule 1.6. Therefore, unless authorized to do so, the lawyer may not disclose such information. When taking protective action pursuant to paragraph (b), the lawyer is impliedly authorized to make the necessary disclosures, even when the client directs the lawyer to the contrary. Nevertheless, given the risks of disclosure, paragraph (c) limits what the lawyer may disclose in consulting with other individuals or entities or seeking the appointment of a legal representative. At the very least, the lawyer should determine whether it is likely that the person or entity consulted with will act adversely to the client's interests before discussing matters related to the client. The lawyer's position in such cases is an unavoidably difficult one.

    3. Model Code
    4. EC 7-12

      Any mental or physical condition of a client that renders him incapable of making a considered judgment on his own behalf casts additional responsibilities upon his lawyer. Where an incompetent is acting through a guardian or other legal representative, a lawyer must look to such representative for those decisions which are normally the prerogative of the client to make. If a client under disability has no legal representative, his lawyer may be compelled in court proceedings to make decisions on behalf of the client. If the client is capable of understanding the matter in question or of contributing to the advancement of his interests, regardless of whether he is legally disqualified from performing certain acts, the lawyer should obtain from him all possible aid. If the disability of a client and the lack of a legal representative compel the lawyer to make decisions for his client, the lawyer should consider all circumstances then prevailing and act with care to safeguard and advance the interests of his client. But obviously a lawyer cannot perform any act or make any decision which the law requires his client to perform or make, either acting for himself if competent, or by a duly constituted representative if legally incompetent.

    5. Case Law

    ABA Formal Opinion 96-404, August 2, 1996

    A lawyer who reasonably believes his client has become incompetent to handle his own affairs may take protective action on behalf of his client, including petitioning for appointment of a guardian. Withdrawal is appropriate only if it can be accomplished without prejudice to the client. Lawyer should then not represent the third party seeking to be appointed guardian over his client.

  1. Resources
    1. Prior Austin Conference Handouts
      1. Practical Ethics: Use of Advocate or Paralegal in a P&A Practice. Limitations Based on Unauthorized Practice of Law. Austin 2004 Conference Handout: http://www.nls.org/conf2004/practical_ethics.htm
      2. The Ethical Dilemma of Dealing with Adverse Evidence- Zealous Advocacy vs. Duty to the Courts, Austin 2003 Conference Handout: http://www.nls.org/conf2003/ethical-dilemma.htm
      3. Practical Ethics and Fee Shifting Statutes, Austin 2002 Conference Handout: http://www.nls.org/conf2002/practical_ethics.htm
      4. Ethical Conflicts in Representing People with Questionable Capacity, Austin 2001 Conference Handout, available from NLS.
    1. Web Sites

www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/aba/mcpr/MCPR.HTM

This site takes you right into the Preamble to the Model Code of Professional Responsibility. At the conclusion of each section, there is a link to the Model Rules version. The notes for each section are also accessed though links. If you follow the links to the Model Rules version, you can access comments to the Rules, history, current version, etc.

www.law.cornell.edu/ethics/comparative

This site takes you to the American Legal Ethics Library of the Legal Information Institute (LII). Under "ways to access material", click on "Listing by topic" on the far right. This will take you into an incredible comparison of the rules and code by jurisdiction.

www.abanet.org/cpr/ethicopinions.html

Page contains "headnote" summaries of Formal Ethics Opinions of the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility. The full opinions are available for purchase by clicking on the "order here" link next to each opinion.

www.abanet.org/cpr/ethics.html

On far left, click on "Legal Ethics". If you select "Model Rules of Professional Conduct" and then "Table of Contents", you can access each Rule. You can also access the "Model Code of Professional Responsibility", but I was unable to cut and paste from this version.

www.abanet.org/legalservices/downloads/sclaid/civilstandards.pdf

This site is for the Standards for Providers of Civil Legal Services to the Poor.

Return to Table of Contents | NLS Home Page | Feedback | Search the NLS Website