|
1
|
- Presented by:
- Lewis Golinker, Esq.
- Director, Assistive Technology Law Center
- 401 East State Street, Suite 300
- Ithaca, New York 14850
- 607-277-7286 (v)
- 607-277-5239 (fax)
- Lgolinker@aol.com (e-mail)<=
/li>
- Bridges to Better Advocacy
- Austin, Texas
- April 7, 2006
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Insurance Policies
- Health Benefits Plans
- 4 types:
- Self-funded plans
- Partially-funded plans
- Insured plans
- Exempt plans
|
|
4
|
- Insurance Policies: purcha=
sed
from an insurance company as a package.
A premium is paid and claims are paid from the accumulated
premiums by the insurer. R=
isks
of utilization are borne by insurer.
- Health Benefits Plans: employer creates a plan; writes its own scop=
e of
benefits; and pays claims out of its own assets. Risk of utilizatio=
n is
borne by employer. The pla=
n may
hire an insurer to administer the plan.
|
|
5
|
- self-funded: an employer or association creates a plan and funds it
totally, from company or association assets.
- partially-funded: the plan purchases an insurance policy to cover
certain risks (excess cost or “stop-loss”policies).
- insured plan: the employer or association creates a plan, but the pl=
an
then purchases insurance to cover its outlays.
- exempt plan: the term applied to a plan issued by a government.
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Insurance Policies, Insured & Exempt Plans are governed by:
- State Contract Law & Common Law
- State Unfair Trade Practices Law
- Americans with Disabilities Act
|
|
8
|
- Insurers’ and Health Benefits Plans’ SGD denials will be based on:=
li>
- “Adverse ‘Fit’ Determinations”
- Express Exclusions
|
|
9
|
- Long History of SGD Coverage
- Diversity in Theory; Common in Practice
- Strong Legal Protections
- Lots of Supporting Information
- Low Incidence Need; No Woodwork Effect
- Cost:Defense Ratio is Very Low
|
|
10
|
- Legal Rules that Govern Policies:
- Duty to Investigate Claims
- Ambiguity
- Any Reasonable Interpretation to Support Coverage Controls
- Exceptions Read Narrowly
- Non-Discrimination Absent Actuarial Data
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Express Exclusions:
- Policy or Plan states SGDs are excluded
- SGDs fit within scope of larger benefit exclusion (e.g., developmen=
tal
care (care to treat a developmental disability affecting speech
development))
|
|
13
|
- What Benefits Are Covered?
- Reviewer Credibility: Can
reviewer credibility be questioned?
- Duty to Investigate: What did reviewer look at prior to deciding?
- Internal Search: Has Insurer or Plan addressed similar issues
previously?
- External Search: Have professional literature; professional societi=
es,
and other funding sources addressed similar issues?
|
|
14
|
- Look for DME
- Look for Prosthetic Devices
- Look for Definitions:
- No definition at all
- Copies Medicare
- Copies Parts of Medicare
- Idiosyncratic
- Lists specific items
|
|
15
|
- DME is equipment that:
- 1. Can withstand repeated use;
- 2. Primarily and customarily is used to serve a medical purpose;<=
/li>
- 3. Generally is not useful to an individual in the absence of
illness or injury; and
- 4. Is suitable for use in the home.
- 42 C.F.R. 414.202
|
|
16
|
- DME which is used for medical necessity [sic] such as:
- Appliances which replace lost body part;
- Orthotic devices such as arm, leg, neck, and back braces;
- Hospital type beds;
- Equipment needed to increase mobility, such as a wheelchair;
- Respirators and other equipment for the use of oxygen;
- Monitoring devices.
|
|
17
|
- Equipment which is:
- 1. Determined to be medica=
lly
necessary to treat an illness or injury or condition;
- 2. Of no further use when =
the
medical necessity ends;
- 3. For exclusive use of the
patient;
- 4. Not primarily for comfo=
rt or
convenience
- 5. Not for environmental c=
ontrol
or exercise
- 6. Manufactured specifical=
ly for
medical use
- Includes wheelchairs, hospital beds, and other items the Plan determ=
ines
are DME.
|
|
18
|
- Who Reviewed? Is the reviewer identified?
- Does reviewer have any knowledge or experience relevant to SGDs?
- Conduct Google.Com search
- Check state medical society web page
- Check AMA web page:
- http://webapps.ama-assn.org/doctorfinder/html/patient.html
- What was scope of investigation of claim?
- Ask for production of all documents examined or reviewed
|
|
19
|
- Look at how Insurer or Plan answered same questions in other cases=
li>
- Search for Prior “Yes” Decisions
- Existence of Prior “Yes” creates duty to investigate and explain:=
li>
- Was scope of benefits and vocabulary the same?
- Even if different, why do differences justify “yes” then, and “no”
today?
|
|
20
|
- Clinical Criteria: Many ins=
urers
have adopted SGD clinical criteria:
- More than 2 dozen BCBS programs
- Aetna:
- www.aetna.com/cpb/data/CPBA0437.html
- CIGNA:
- www.cigna.com/health/provider/medical/procedural/coverage_position=
s/medical/mm_0049_coveragepositioncriteria_speech_generating_devices.pdf
- Harvard-Pilgrim Health Plan:
- www.harvardpilgrim.org/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PROVIDERS/HPHCONNECT/U=
SERGUIDES/DURABLE_MEDICAL_EQUIPMENT.PDF
|
|
21
|
- What do other information sources have to say about key questions:=
li>
- Professional societies
- Other funding sources
- Did insurer or plan look?
- How can its interpretations be “reasonable” or not arbitrary when th=
ey
conflict with this information?
|
|
22
|
- Compare, if no definition:
- Medicare
- Medicaid
- Other Insurers
- If definition, will be definition specific
|
|
23
|
- Compare:
- AMA
- American Academy of Neurology
- American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Formal Request
- All posted at: www.augcom=
inc.com/funding.html
- Tricare – Congress expressly authorized coverage
- VA
|
|
24
|
- Not likely to be part of standard
- Insurer or plan can’t invent standards to apply or import them from
elsewhere if not stated in policy or plan
- Not consistent with coverage of wheelchairs, other mobility aids,
oxygen, other common DME items – none address underlying condition=
li>
- Medicare SGD decisions
|
|
25
|
- Compare:
- FDA, 48 Fed. Reg. 53049 (No. 23, 1983) codifying, 21 C.F.R. 890.3710.
- Medicare
- DME Definition
- SLP Functional Treatment Goals
- Medicaid
|
|
26
|
- Not How DME is worded in definition
- Phrase was used in old Medicare NCD, but that was withdrawn April 20=
00,
and replaced Jan. 1, 2001
|
|
27
|
- No one who can speak will be evaluated or consider SGD: speech rate is > 10 x SGD rat=
e
- Devices are “dedicated” – no use except as SGDs
|
|
28
|
- Compare:
- Medicare (only program ever to call SGDs convenience items in polic=
y;
dropped “convenience item” label in April 2000, effective, Jan. 1,
2001)
- Tricare – has regulations defining convenience items; never conside=
red
SGDs under this rule
- Anecdotes: both Medicare and Tricare have examples of convenience i=
tems
(SGDs are nothing like them);
court and other statements about importance of communication=
|
|
29
|
- Compare: Medicare; Medicaid; FDA
- Use “but for” (solely because of) test: not because of work or school
needs SGD
- Stated as alternative to “primarily and customarily serve a medical =
purpose”
- Factually wrong: Education less than 20% of day; work less than one
third – hardly “primarily”
|
|
30
|
- Summary:
- Attack on these excuses mirrors Medicaid and Medicare
- We have more than sufficient information from unassailable sources =
to
show that reasonable interpretations support coverage and that deni=
als
have no comparable basis beyond individual reviewer opinion
|
|
31
|
- Basis: insurers and plans have freedom to cover whatever they want=
li>
- 3 Step Challenge:
- Ensure express exclusion for SGDs exists
- Isolate exclusion as only reason for denial
- Look to apply external (to policy or plan) legal framework to
neutralize or void exclusion
|
|
32
|
- Policy or Plan must state exclusion for SGDs or SGDs must fit within=
a
broader exclusion
- If no exclusion, non-coverage or excluded claim is merely reviewer
opinion, and this is an adverse fit determination
- Exclusions are non-discretionary; they apply the policy or plan; they
don’t require interpretations
|
|
33
|
- DME Exclusions: Appliances,
devices and equipment not covered by the plan include, but are not
limited to: speech devices; ….
|
|
34
|
- General Exclusions: The Plan does not pay for benefits under the Plan
for any expense related to:
- Which results from: (1) pervasive developmental disability; (2) men=
tal
retardation; (3) conduct disorders; or (4) developmental disorders;=
|
|
35
|
- General Exclusions: The Plan does not pay for benefits under the Plan
for any expense related to:
- For Developmental Care, which means services or supplies, … which:<=
/li>
- A) are provided to a member who has not previously reached the leve=
l of
development (i.e., developmental delay) expected for the member’s a=
ge
in the following areas of major life activity: (1) intellectual; (2) physical;=
(3)
receptive and expressive language; …
- B) are not primarily rehabilitative in nature (restoring fully
developed skills that were lost or impaired due to injury or sickne=
ss;
or
- C) are primarily educational
|
|
36
|
- Computer “story boards” or “light talkers” for communication impaired
individuals
- Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, 1997
- Computer equipment/devices such as “story boards” or other communica=
tion
aids to assist communication impaired individuals
- Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, BCBS Policy, 2005
|
|
37
|
- Show that SGD otherwise will be covered
- If coverable and exclusion is void, result can be approval of device,
rather than remand for further proceedings
- E.g., Iwata v. Intel Corp., 349 F.Supp.2d 135, 142 (D.Mass. 2004)=
li>
|
|
38
|
- State Health Insurance Unfair Discrimination Statutes prohibit:
- Making or permitting any unfair discrimination between individuals =
of
the same class and of essentially the same hazard in the amount of
premium, policy fees or rates charged for any accident or health
insurance policy or in the benefits payable thereunder, or in any of
the terms or conditions of such policy ···
|
|
39
|
- Titles I through IV of this Act shall not be construed to prohibit or
restrict—
- (1) an insurer, … health maintenance organization, or any agent, or
entity that administers benefit plans, or similar organizations from
underwriting risks, classifying risks, or administering such risks t=
hat
are based on or not inconsistent with State law; or
(2) a person or organization covered by this Act from
establishing, sponsoring, observing or administering the terms of a =
bona
fide benefit plan that are based on underwriting risks, classifying
risks, or administering such risks that are based on or not inconsis=
tent
with State law;
- ADA, Section 501(c)(1) & (2), 42 USCA § 12201(c)(1) & (2).=
li>
|
|
40
|
- ADA and state law claims will overlap – may allow choice of forum
- Demand production of all data, reports, studies and other informatio=
n on
which SGD exclusion is based.
- Specifically demand all actuarial or cost basis for SGD exclusion
- No actuarial basis exists to exclude SGDs
- 2003 estimate of cost per member per month: 1/10 cent
- Policy or plan will not have to be re-priced (increase premium) if =
SGDs
were not excluded.
- If not cost based, what is the basis for SGD exclusion? What purpose does exclusion
service? Why did SGDs ever =
come
to notice?
|
|
41
|
- WWW.AAC-RERC.COM
- RMRP for SGDs: outline of SLP assessment
- Protocol for data gathering in SLP assessment
- Model reports
- WWW.AUGCOMINC.COM
- Medical Professional Society Letters
- Formal Request (professional literature review)
- WWW.AACFUNDINGHELP.COM
|